Youngs -v- SFPD, et al
Filing
12
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/18/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2014)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
4
5
TYRONE YOUNGS,
6
7
No. C 14-0055 RS (PR)
Plaintiff,
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
v.
8
SAN FRANCISCO POLICE
DEPARTMENT, and
SAN FRANCISCO SHERIFF’S
10 DEPARTMENT,
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
9
11
Defendants.
/
12
13
Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s order to (1) perfect his application to
14
proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), or (2) pay the full filing fee of $350.00. The IFP
15
application lacks two necessary documents: (a) a prison trust account statement showing
16
transactions for the last six months, and (b) a Certificate of Funds signed by an authorized
17
prison officer. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failing to
18
respond to the Court’s order, and for failure to prosecute, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Because
19
this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen the action. Any such
20
motion must contain (1) a prison trust account statement showing transactions for the last six
21
months and (2) a Certificate of Funds signed by an authorized prison officer, or (3) full
22
payment for the filing fee of $350.00. His IFP applications (Docket Nos. 4 and 10) are
23
DENIED without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendants,
24
terminate Docket Nos. 4 and 10, and close the file.
25
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: February 18, 2014
RICHARD SEEBORG
United States District Judge
28
No. C 14-0055 RS (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?