Youngs -v- SFPD, et al

Filing 12

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 2/18/14. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/18/2014)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 4 5 TYRONE YOUNGS, 6 7 No. C 14-0055 RS (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL v. 8 SAN FRANCISCO POLICE DEPARTMENT, and SAN FRANCISCO SHERIFF’S 10 DEPARTMENT, United States District Court For the Northern District of California 9 11 Defendants. / 12 13 Plaintiff has failed to comply with the Court’s order to (1) perfect his application to 14 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), or (2) pay the full filing fee of $350.00. The IFP 15 application lacks two necessary documents: (a) a prison trust account statement showing 16 transactions for the last six months, and (b) a Certificate of Funds signed by an authorized 17 prison officer. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED without prejudice for failing to 18 respond to the Court’s order, and for failure to prosecute, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Because 19 this dismissal is without prejudice, plaintiff may move to reopen the action. Any such 20 motion must contain (1) a prison trust account statement showing transactions for the last six 21 months and (2) a Certificate of Funds signed by an authorized prison officer, or (3) full 22 payment for the filing fee of $350.00. His IFP applications (Docket Nos. 4 and 10) are 23 DENIED without prejudice. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of defendants, 24 terminate Docket Nos. 4 and 10, and close the file. 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: February 18, 2014 RICHARD SEEBORG United States District Judge 28 No. C 14-0055 RS (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?