Illumination Dynamics Co., LTD. v. Pacific Lighting Solutions L.L.C. et al

Filing 18

ORDER GRANTING re 17 Stipulation To Extend Time for Defendant Pacific Lighint to Respond to Complaint filed by Pacific Lighting Solutions L.L.C.. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on 2/3/14. (klhS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/3/2014)

4

Scott L. Baker, SBN 128032
Yuval M. Rogso~ SBN 235291
BAKER & .ASSuCIATES
1875 Century Park East, Suite 1490
Los Angeles CA 90067
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: (3-10) 553-2254

5

Counsel for Defendant Pacific Lighting Solutions L.L.C.

1
2

3

6

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ILLUMINATION DYNAMICS CO.,
LTD., a foreign company,

12
13

14
15
16

Plaintiff,
v.

PACIFIC LIGHTING SOLUTIONS
L.L.C. and BILL ZHANG, an individual,

CASE NO.: 3:14-CV-00078-JCS
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME
FOR DEFENDANT PACIFIC
LIGHTING SOLUTIONS L.L.C. TO
RESPOND TO INITIAL
COMPLAINT
[LOCAL RULE 6-l(a)]
Complaint Served:
January 10, 2014
Current Response Date: January 31,2014
New Response Date: February 18, 2014

Defendants.

17

Hon. Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero

18
19

20

STIPULATION

21
22
23
24
25

26
27

28

Plaintiff Illumination Dynamics Co., LTD. ("IDC") and Defendant Pacific
Lighting Solutions L.L.C. ("PLS"), by and through their respective attorneys of
record, stipulate and agree as follows:
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint in the above-captioned action on

January 6, 2014;
WHEREAS, PLS was served with the Complaint on January 10, 2014;
WHEREAS, PLS' responsive pleading is currently due January 31, 2014;
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT
BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 6-l(a))

1
2

WHEREAS, the parties have not previously agreed to any extension of time on

PLS' s deadline to respond to the Complaint; and

3

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the time within which PLS has

4

to respond to the Complaint by two weeks to February 18, 2014 pursuant to Local

5

Rule 6-1(a).

6

7

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED THAT:

8

PLS shall have until February 18, 2014 to respond to the Complaint.

9
10

Dated: January 31, 2014

BAKER & ASSOCIATES

11

By:

12
13

/s/
--------------------Scott L. Baker
Attorneys for Defendant
Pacific Lighting Solutions L.L.C.

14
15

Dated: January 31, 2014

BURNHAM BROWN

17

By:

/s/_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Jimmie L. Williams
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Illumination Dynamics Co., LTD.

18
19

RT

24

Judge Jo

ER

pero

S
seph C.

A

H

25

ERED

O ORD

R NIA

NO

23

DAted: February 3, 2014

IT IS S

LI

22

UNIT
ED

21

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

RT
U
O

S

20

FO

16

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT
BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 6-l(a))

1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

2

I hereby certify that on January 31, 2014, I caused the foregoing
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR DEFENDANT PACIFIC LIGHTING
4 SOLUTIONS L.L.C. TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT to be
electronically filed with the Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system which will
5 send notification of such filing to:
3

6

7
8

9

Jimmie L. Williams
Jack W. Schwartz, Jr.
BURNHAM BROWN th
1901 Harrison Street, 14 Floor
Oakland, California 94612
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Illumination Dynamics Co., LTD.

10

11

. . I certify that all parties in this case are represented by counsel who are CM/ECF
participants.

12
13
14
15

Is/
Vasko C. Alexander

16
17
18
19

20
21

22
23
24
25

26
27

28
2
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT
BY NOT MORE THAN 30 DAYS (L.R. 6-l(a))