Ehret v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Filing 87

Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 86 Stipulation. Portions of the proposed stipulation and order are beyond the authority of the discovery referral judge to order, e.g., the parties' stipulation to extend the briefing schedule for the motion for class certification. Such requests should be submitted to Judge Chen. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 EHRET, 12 13 No. C-14-00113-EMC (DMR) Plaintiff(s), v. 14 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 15 ORDER DENYING PROPOSED STIPULATION AND ORDER [DOCKET NO. 86] Defendant(s). ___________________________________/ 16 17 The parties have filed a proposed stipulation and order. [Docket No. 86.] Portions of the 18 proposed stipulation and order are beyond the authority of the discovery referral judge to order, e.g., 19 the parties’ stipulation to extend the briefing schedule for the motion for class certification. Such 20 requests should be submitted to Judge Chen. Accordingly, the parties’ stipulation and proposed 21 order is denied. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: December 9, 2014 26 27 28 DONNA M. RYU United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?