Ehret v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
Filing
87
Order by Magistrate Judge Donna M. Ryu denying 86 Stipulation. Portions of the proposed stipulation and order are beyond the authority of the discovery referral judge to order, e.g., the parties' stipulation to extend the briefing schedule for the motion for class certification. Such requests should be submitted to Judge Chen. (dmrlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/9/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
EHRET,
12
13
No. C-14-00113-EMC (DMR)
Plaintiff(s),
v.
14
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
15
ORDER DENYING PROPOSED
STIPULATION AND ORDER [DOCKET
NO. 86]
Defendant(s).
___________________________________/
16
17
The parties have filed a proposed stipulation and order. [Docket No. 86.] Portions of the
18
proposed stipulation and order are beyond the authority of the discovery referral judge to order, e.g.,
19
the parties’ stipulation to extend the briefing schedule for the motion for class certification. Such
20
requests should be submitted to Judge Chen. Accordingly, the parties’ stipulation and proposed
21
order is denied.
22
23
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: December 9, 2014
26
27
28
DONNA M. RYU
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?