Ehret v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

Filing 89

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 88 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER filed by Uber Technologies, Inc. Case Management Statement due by 5/28/2015. Further Case Management Conference reset for 6/4/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco. Class Certification Motion Hearing set for 6/4/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 12/10/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2014)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
John B. Quinn (SBN: 090378)
2 [e-mail]
865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
3 Los Angeles, CA 90017-2543
[phone]
4 Telephone:
Facsimile:
[phone]
5
Stephen A. Swedlow (pro hac vice)
6 [e-mail]
Amit B. Patel (pro hac vice)
7 [e-mail]
500 W. Madison Street, Suite 2450
8 Chicago, IL 60661-2510
Telephone:
[phone]
[phone]
9 Facsimile:
10 Arthur M. Roberts (SBN: 275272)
[e-mail]
11 50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-4788
12 Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
13
Attorneys for Defendant
14 Uber Technologies, Inc.
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

16
17 CAREN EHRET,

Case No. 3:14-cv-00113-EMC

18

[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND
ORDER

19

Plaintiff,
v.

20 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, Inc.,
21
Defendant.

Judge: Edward M. Chen

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: 14-cv-00113-EMC
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER

Pursuant to the Court’s Order of November 26, 2014, Defendant Uber Technologies, Inc.

1

2 (“Uber”) and Plaintiff Caren Ehret (“Plaintiff”), by and through their attorneys of record, stipulate
3 as follows:
4

1.

The deadline for Uber’s production of emails and other ESI from additional

5

custodians Travis Kalanick, Ryan Graves and Andrew Macdonald shall be January

6

23, 2015.

7

2.

The deadline for Plaintiff’s filing of a motion for class certification shall be

8

extended to March 12, 2015. The deadline for Uber’s filing of its opposition to

9

Plaintiff’s motion for class certification shall be extended to April 16, 2015, and the
deadline for Plaintiff’s reply shall be extended to May 14, 2015.

10
11

Uber enters this stipulation without prejudice to Uber's right to object to Judge Ryu's

12 November 26, 2014 order regarding custodians and date ranges and the timeline for production,
13 and reserves its right to file an objection to the order with Judge Chen. Plaintiff reserves her right
14 to oppose such an objection.
15 DATED: December 9, 2014
16

By
/s/ Stephen A. Swedlow
Stephen A. Swedlow
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Attorney for Uber Technologies, Inc.

17
18
19 DATED: December 9, 2014
20

By

21
22

/s/ Hall Adams1
Hall Adams
Law Offices of Hall Adams LLC
Attorneys for Plaintiff

23
24
25
26
27
28

1

I, Stephen A. Swedlow, certify that Hall Adams concurs in the filing of this document.
-1-

Case No.: 14-cv-00113-EMC
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER

5

UNIT
ED

7
8

RT

Judge E

ER

H

10
11

ICT
C

ERE
O ORD D
IT IS S
IFIE
D
AS MO

NO

9

S
TE
TA

RT
U
O

S

6

D

R NIA

4

IT IS SO ORDERED. The hearing on the class certification motion
is set for 6/4/15 at 1:30 p.m. CMC is reset
12/10/14
Dated: __________________ from 4/23/15 to 6/4/15 at 1:30 p.m. An updated
___________________________
joint CMC statement due 5/28/15.
Judge Edward M. DISTR
Chen

. Chen

dward M

FO

3

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the Court hereby approves this Stipulation.

LI

2

ORDER

A

1

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-

Case No.: 14-cv-00113-EMC
[PROPOSED] STIPULATION AND ORDER