Taylor
Filing
7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/03/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
MONTE TAYLOR,
Case No. 14-cv-00154-WHO
Plaintiff,
10
v.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
JOHN DOE,
Defendant.
13
14
15
Plaintiff Taylor has failed to comply with the Court’s order to (1) file a complete
16
application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), or (2) pay the full filing fee of $350.00.
17
He has also failed to file a complaint. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED without
18
prejudice for failing to respond to the Court’s order, and for failure to prosecute, see Fed.
19
R. Civ. P. 41(b). Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Taylor may move to reopen
20
the action. Any such motion must contain (1) a complete IFP application, or full payment
21
for the $350.00 filing fee, and (2) a complaint. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of
22
defendant, and close the file.
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 3, 2014
_________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MONTE TAYLOR,
Case Number: CV14-00154 WHO
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
JOHN DOE,
Defendant.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on March 3, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy of the attached, by placing said copy
in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope
in the U.S. Mail.
Monte Taylor T-31655
San Quentin State Prison
IN85L
1 Main Street
San Quentin, CA 94964
Dated: March 3, 2014
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jean Davis, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?