Filing 7

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 03/03/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MONTE TAYLOR, Case No. 14-cv-00154-WHO Plaintiff, 10 v. ORDER OF DISMISSAL United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 JOHN DOE, Defendant. 13 14 15 Plaintiff Taylor has failed to comply with the Court’s order to (1) file a complete 16 application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”), or (2) pay the full filing fee of $350.00. 17 He has also failed to file a complaint. Accordingly, the action is DISMISSED without 18 prejudice for failing to respond to the Court’s order, and for failure to prosecute, see Fed. 19 R. Civ. P. 41(b). Because this dismissal is without prejudice, Taylor may move to reopen 20 the action. Any such motion must contain (1) a complete IFP application, or full payment 21 for the $350.00 filing fee, and (2) a complaint. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of 22 defendant, and close the file. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 3, 2014 _________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MONTE TAYLOR, Case Number: CV14-00154 WHO Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. JOHN DOE, Defendant. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on March 3, 2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy of the attached, by placing said copy in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail. Monte Taylor T-31655 San Quentin State Prison IN85L 1 Main Street San Quentin, CA 94964 Dated: March 3, 2014 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jean Davis, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?