Winkelman et al v. Novartis AG et al

Filing 25

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Michelle Cruz, Julie Winkelman filed by Michelle Cruz, Julie Winkelman. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 8, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2014)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Julie Winkelmann and Michelle Cruz, on behalf of themselves and all other similarly situated ,individuals CASE NO. ______________________ 3:14-cv-00160-JST Plaintiff(s), v. Novartis Consumer Health, Inc., Novartis AG, and Novartis Corporation , Defendant(s). _______________________________/ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: Private mediation, by a ✔ 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ mediator TBD by mutual agreement of the parties _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) ✔ 9 defer setting deadline until full schedule is known other requested deadline _____________________________________________ Dated:___________ 4/2/2014 ____________________________ /s/ Matthew B. George Attorney for Plaintiff Dated:____________ 4/2/2014 ____________________________ /s/ Aton Arbisser Attorney for Defendant CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE [PROPOSED] ORDER The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. ERED O ORD IT IS S R NIA UNIT ED Dated: April 8, 2014 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S XX 9 9 __________________________________ NO UNITED STATES nDISTRICT S . Ti ga r e Jo MAGISTRATE JUDGE FO A H ER LI RT Judg N D IS T IC T R OF C When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.” Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?