Winkelman et al v. Novartis AG et al
Filing
25
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 21 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Michelle Cruz, Julie Winkelman filed by Michelle Cruz, Julie Winkelman. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 8, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/8/2014)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Julie Winkelmann and Michelle Cruz, on behalf of themselves
and all other similarly situated ,individuals
CASE NO. ______________________
3:14-cv-00160-JST
Plaintiff(s),
v.
Novartis Consumer Health, Inc., Novartis AG,
and Novartis Corporation
,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Private mediation, by a
✔
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
mediator TBD by mutual agreement of the parties
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
✔
9
defer setting deadline until full schedule is known
other requested deadline _____________________________________________
Dated:___________
4/2/2014
____________________________
/s/ Matthew B. George
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated:____________
4/2/2014
____________________________
/s/ Aton Arbisser
Attorney for Defendant
CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE
[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
R NIA
UNIT
ED
Dated: April 8, 2014
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
S
XX
9
9
__________________________________
NO
UNITED STATES nDISTRICT
S . Ti ga r
e Jo MAGISTRATE JUDGE
FO
A
H
ER
LI
RT
Judg
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”
Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?