Natividad v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Filing
15
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF OPPOSITION IN COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE COURT'S STANDING ORDERS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on February 27, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/27/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
PATRICK NATIVIDAD,
Plaintiff,
12
13
14
No. C 14-0215 MMC
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
SUBMIT CHAMBERS COPY OF
OPPOSITION IN COMPLIANCE WITH
CIVIL LOCAL RULES AND THE
COURT’S STANDING ORDERS
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., et al.,
Defendants.
15
/
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
On February 20, 2014, plaintiff Patrick Natividad (“Natividad”) filed opposition to
defendants’ motion to dismiss. Natividad has violated the Civil Local Rules of this District
and the Court’s Standing Orders, however, by failing “to provide for chambers a paper copy
of each document that is electronically filed . . . marked ‘Chambers Copy’.” See Civil L.R.
5-1(e)(7); see also Standing Orders For Civil Cases Assigned to The Honorable Maxine M.
Chesney ¶ 2.
Natividad is hereby ORDERED to comply with Civil Local Rule 5-1(e)(7) and the
Court’s Standing Orders by immediately submitting a chambers copy of the abovereferenced document. Natividad is hereby advised that if he fails in the future to comply
with the Court’s Standing Orders to provide a chambers copy of each electronically-filed
document, the Court may impose sanctions, including, but not limited to, striking from the
1
record any electronically-filed document of which a chambers copy has not been timely
2
provided to the Court.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
Dated: February 27, 2014
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?