Natividad v. Bank of America, N.A. et al

Filing 24

STIPULATION AND ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on May 27, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/27/2014)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Patrick Natividad
CASENO.~
C~1~4-~0~21~5~--------

Plaintiff(s),
v.

Bank of America, N.A., et al.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

Defendant(s).
________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:

0
0

[{]

Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)

(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conf rence with a Magistrate Judge is
e
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form ofADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice ofNeed for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

,.'e(ivate Process:
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) - - - - - - - - -

U

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date ofthe order

0

referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)

[Z]
Dated: '5

Dated:

other requested deadline ---.:.:::..::..._=..::....:::..:::.::::...::.:.::::....::::.::::__....,.._ _ _ _ _=--- -

- ~-/ <./

:Sld-3/i

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

[PROPOSED) ORDER

X
0

D

Dated:

The parties' stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties' stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

May 27, 2014
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATEJUDGE

DISTRICT

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., "Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation."

Rev. 12/1 I
Page 2 of2