Natividad v. Bank of America, N.A. et al

Filing 28

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(2). Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 20, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Charles T. Marshall, Esquire (SBN 176091) Law Offices of Charles T. Marshall 415 Laurel Street, # 405 San Diego, California 92101 Tel: 619-807-2628 Fax: 866-575-7413 Email: cmarshall@marshallestatelaw.com 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff PATRICK NATIVIDAD 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 10 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 OAKLAND DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 PATRICK NATIVIDAD ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) v. ) ) ) BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., MORTGAGE ) ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, ) INC. and THE BANK OF NEW YORK ) MELLON f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK ) as Trustee for the ALTERNATIVE LOAN ) TRUST 2005-72, MORTGAGE PASS) THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005- ) 72 ) ) ) ) ) Defendant(s). ) ) ) Case No.: 3:14-CV-00215-MMC Honorable Maxine M. Chesney [PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(2) Complaint filed: January 14, 2014 Trial Date: None 24 25 26 27 28 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(2) Proposed Order 1 1 2 3 Plaintiff having moved for dismissal of case against Defendants BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. and THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK as Trustee for the ALTERNATIVE LOAN 4 TRUST 2005-72, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-72 from the 5 6 7 above-entitled action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), and good cause having been shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. 8 9 10 20 Dated: June ________, 2014 19 _______________________________ United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(2) Proposed Order 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?