Natividad v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Filing
28
ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(2). Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on June 20, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2014)
1
2
3
4
Charles T. Marshall, Esquire (SBN 176091)
Law Offices of Charles T. Marshall
415 Laurel Street, # 405
San Diego, California 92101
Tel: 619-807-2628
Fax: 866-575-7413
Email: cmarshall@marshallestatelaw.com
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
PATRICK NATIVIDAD
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
10
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
OAKLAND DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
PATRICK NATIVIDAD
)
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
)
v.
)
)
)
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., MORTGAGE )
ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, )
INC. and THE BANK OF NEW YORK
)
MELLON f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK )
as Trustee for the ALTERNATIVE LOAN
)
TRUST 2005-72, MORTGAGE PASS)
THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005- )
72
)
)
)
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
)
)
Case No.: 3:14-CV-00215-MMC
Honorable Maxine M. Chesney
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR
VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT
TO F.R.C.P. 41(a)(2)
Complaint filed: January 14, 2014
Trial Date:
None
24
25
26
27
28
Motion for Voluntary Dismissal Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(2)
Proposed Order
1
1
2
3
Plaintiff having moved for dismissal of case against Defendants BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.,
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC. and THE BANK OF NEW
YORK MELLON f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK as Trustee for the ALTERNATIVE LOAN
4
TRUST 2005-72, MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2005-72 from the
5
6
7
above-entitled action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), and good cause having
been shown, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED.
8
9
10
20
Dated: June ________, 2014
19
_______________________________
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Motion for Voluntary Dismissal Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 41(a)(2)
Proposed Order
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?