Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation

Filing 167

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 165 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re Briefing and Hearing Schedule on Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint filed by Samuel Barone-Crowell, Dominic Seale, Casey McCaleb, Eric Essler, Wesley Varughese, William Woods, Set/Reset Deadlines as to 165 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Re Briefing and Hearing Schedule on Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint< /i>, 166 MOTION for Leave to File Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. Responses due by 6/3/2015 5:00 p.m. Replies due by 6/4/2015 5:00 p.m. Motion Hearing set for 6/11/2015 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Edward M. Chen.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/1/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2015)

Download PDF
1 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 090058) 2 Christina Humphrey, Esq. (SBN 226326) Leslie H. Joyner, Esq. (SBN 262705) 3 29229 Canwood Street, Suite 208 Agoura Hills, California 91301 (818) 991-8080 Facsimile: (818) 991-8081 5 ssaltzman@marlinsaltzman.com chumphrey@marlinsaltzman.com 6 ljoyner@marlinsaltzman.com 4 Telephone: 7 DIVERSITY LAW GROUP, A Professional Corporation Larry W. Lee, Esq. (SBN 228175) 8 550 S. Hope St., Suite 2655 Los Angeles, California 90071 9 Telephone: (213) 488-6555 Facsimile: (213) 488-6554 10 dchang@diversitylaw.com 11 lwlee@diversitylaw.com 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 WILLIAM WOODS (CA), DOMINIC SEALE 16 17 18 19 20 21 (FL), WESLEY VARUGHESE (IL), ERIC ESSLER (MI), KRISTINA WILLS (MN), CASEY MCCALEB (MO), SAMUEL BARONE-CROWELL (NY), LOWELL HARVARD JR. (NY), ALTWELL WINFIELD (NY), TIFFANY REINHART (OH), individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals, CASE NO. 14-CV-00264-EMC (Hon. Edward M. Chen) STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Modified) Plaintiffs, v. CLASS ACTION 22 VECTOR MARKETING CORPORATION and 23 DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 28 -1- Stipulation and Proposed Order Re Briefing andHearing Schedule on Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC 1 This stipulation is entered into by and between Plaintiffs William Woods, Dominic Seale, 2 Wesley Varughese, Eric Essler, and Samuel Barone-Crowell (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Vector 3 Marketing Corporation (“Defendant,” or collectively with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”) by and through 4 their counsel of record, with reference to the following facts: 5 A. On or about January 16, 2014, Plaintiffs filed their Class and Collective Action Complaint 6 (“Complaint”) in the above-captioned action; 7 B. On or about May 22, 2015, this Court issued its Order Granting In Part and Denying in Part 8 Defendant’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. (Doc. 164). In its Order this Court held that 9 proposed representative plaintiff for the Missouri Class, Casey McCaleb’s claim for unpaid wages 10 under the Missouri Minimum Wage Act was time barred. This court further stated that Plaintiffs may 11 bring a Rule 15 motion to amend to add a new plaintiff and that Plaintiffs may seek leave to bring 12 their Rule 15 motion on an expedited basis. (Order at p. 12). 13 C. 14 The Parties have agreed to the following briefing and hearing schedule: • 15 16 May 29, 2015 – Plaintiffs submit Motion to Amend Complaint to Add a Party Pursuant to FRCP 15(a) • 17 June 5, 2015 – Defendant submits Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend Complaint to Add a Party Pursuant to FRCP 15(a) 18 • June 8, 2015 – Plaintiffs submit Reply 19 • June 11, 2015 – Proposed Hearing Date; or parties will agree to submit on the papers 20 21 at the Court’s discretion. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, through 22 their respective counsel of record and subject to this Courts approval, that Plaintiffs will submit their 23 Motion to Amend on May 29, 2015; Defendant will submit its Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion on 24 June 5, 2015; Plaintiffs will submit their Reply on June 8, 2015 and the hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion 25 will be held on June 11, 2015, or submit based on the papers at the Court’s discretion. 26 This Stipulation is without prejudice to any of Defendant’s defenses or other rights in this 27 action, including (without limitation) the right to oppose the motion to amend. 28 -2- Stipulation and Proposed Order Re Briefing andHearing Schedule on Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC 1 SO STIPULATED. 2 DATED: May 29, 2015 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP DIVERSITY LAW GROUP APC 3 By: 4 5 6 /s/ Christina A. Humphrey Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. Christina A. Humphrey, Esq. Leslie H. Joyner, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 DATED: May 29, 2015 8 MORRISON & FOERSTER PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP 9 By: 10 11 /s/ Karen J. Kubin Karen J. Kubin Attorneys for Defendant Vector Marketing Corporation 12 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION 13 14 15 In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatories on this e-filed document. 16 DATED: May 29, 2015 /s/ Christina A. Humphrey Christina A. Humphrey 17 18 19 [Proposed] ORDER 20 Good cause appearing, the Parties’ Stipulated Briefing and Hearing Schedule set forth above 22 is hereby approved and made an Order of the Court. 23 6/1/15 24 DATED: _______________ S R NIA -3- NO n Stipulation and Proposed Order M. Che rd Re Briefing andHearing Schedule ge Edwa to File First Amended Complaint Jud on Motion for Leave Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC RT FO 28 D RDERE IS SO O FIED IT DI AS MO H E LI 27 UNIT ED 26 S DISTRICT TE Honorable EdwardC Chen M. TAUnited States District Judge RT U O 25 Opposition due 6/3/15 5:00 p.m. Reply due 6/4/15 5:00 p.m. Hearing set for 6/11/15 at 1:30 p.m. A 21

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?