Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation

Filing 177

ORDER DENYING 173 ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO EXTEND TIME. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/10/15. (emclc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2015)

1 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP

Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 090058)

2 Christina Humphrey, Esq. (SBN 226326)
Leslie H. Joyner, Esq. (SBN 262705)

3 29229 Canwood Street, Suite 208
Agoura Hills, California 91301
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
5 [e-mail]
[e-mail]
6 [e-mail]

4 Telephone:

7 DIVERSITY LAW GROUP, A Professional Corporation
Larry W. Lee, Esq. (SBN 228175)

8 Nick Rosenthal, Esq. (SBN 268297)
550 S. Hope St., Suite 2655

9 Los Angeles, California 90071
Telephone:
[phone]
10 Facsimile:
[phone]
11 [e-mail]

[e-mail]

12
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

16 WILLIAM WOODS (CA), DOMINIC SEALE
17 (FL), WESLEY VARUGHESE (IL), ERIC
18
19
20
21

ESSLER (MI), KRISTINA WILLS (MN),
CASEY MCCALEB (MO), SAMUEL
BARONE-CROWELL (NY), LOWELL
HARVARD JR. (NY), ALTWELL WINFIELD
(NY), TIFFANY REINHART (OH), individually
and on behalf of all other similarly situated
individuals,
Plaintiffs,

22
23

CASE NO. 14-CV-00264-EMC
(Hon. Edward M. Chen)
DENYING
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR AN
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE
PLAINTIFFS’ FIRST AMENDED
COMPLAINT AND FOR PERMISSION
TO SUBSTITUTE A NEW PROPOSED
REPRESENTATIVE PLAINTIFF FOR
THE PUTATIVE MISSOURI CLASS

v.
CLASS ACTION

VECTOR MARKETING CORPORATION and
24 DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,

25

Defendants.

26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC

1
2

[PROPOSED] ORDER
Having considered Plaintiffs’ Administrative Motion For An Extension Of Time To File

3 Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint And For Permission To Substitute A New Proposed
4 Representative Plaintiff For The Putative Missouri Class, and the file and record in this action, the
5 Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiffs’ motion. It is hereby ordered that:

Class in place of Tiffany Carsten.
S
UNIT
ED

11
12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

NO

13

dw
Judge E

ard M.

Chen

_______________________________
ER
C
N
Honorable Edward M. Chen F
D IS T IC T O
R
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
H

15

RT

6/10/15
14 DATED: _____________

D

DENIE

RT
U
O

10

ISTRIC
ES D
TC
AT
T

R NIA

9

2. Plaintiffs may substitute a new proposed representative plaintiff for the putative Missouri

FO

8

11, 2015 and

LI

7

1. The time for Plaintiffs to file their First Amended Complaint is extended to Thursday, June

A

6

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION
Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC