Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation
Filing
55
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 53 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulated Tolling Agreement and Proposed Order filed by Samuel Barone-Crowell, Dominic Seale, Casey McCaleb, Eric Essler, Wesley Varughese, William Woods, Lowell Harvard Jr.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/5/14. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2014)
1 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP
Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 090058)
2 Christina Humphrey, Esq. (SBN 226326)
Leslie H. Joyner, Esq. (SBN 2627050
3 29229 Canwood Street, Suite 208
Agoura Hills, California 91301
(818) 991-8080
Facsimile:
(818) 991-8081
5 ssaltzman@marlinsaltzman.com
chumphrey@marlinsaltzman.com
6 ljoyner@marlinsaltzman.com
4 Telephone:
7 DIVERSITY LAW GROUP, A Professional Corporation
Larry W. Lee, Esq. (SBN 228175)
8 550 S. Hope St., Suite 2655
Los Angeles, California 90071
9 Telephone: (213) 488-6555
Facsimile:
(213) 488-6554
10 dchang@diversitylaw.com
11 lwlee@diversitylaw.com
12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15 WILLIAM WOODS (CA), DOMINIC SEALE
16
17
18
19
20
21
(FL), WESLEY VARUGHESE (IL), ERIC
ESSLER (MI), KRISTINA WILLS (MN),
CASEY MCCALEB (MO), SAMUEL
BARONE-CROWELL (NY), LOWELL
HARVARD JR. (NY), ALTWELL WINFIELD
(NY), TIFFANY REINHART (OH), individually
and on behalf of all other similarly situated
individuals,
CASE NO. 14-CV-00264-EMC
(Hon. Edward M. Chen)
STIPULATED TOLLING AGREEMENT
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
CLASS ACTION
Plaintiffs,
v.
22
VECTOR MARKETING CORPORATION and
23 DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,
24
Defendants.
25
26
27
Plaintiffs William Woods, Dominic Seale, Wesley Varughese, Eric Essler, Casey McCaleb,
28 Samuel Barone-Crowell and Lowell Harvard Jr. (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Vector Marketing
-1-
Stipulated Tolling Agreement and [Proposed] Order
Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC
1 Corporation (“Defendant,” or collectively with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”) enter into this Stipulated
2 Tolling Agreement (“Stipulation”) with reference to the following facts:
3
A.
On or about January 16, 2014, Plaintiffs filed their Class and Collective Action
4 Complaint (“Complaint”) in the above-captioned action;
5
B.
The Complaint alleges various wage and hour violations (all of which are denied by
6 Defendant) on behalf of the following putative class of individuals under the Fair Labor Standards
7 Act (hereinafter referred to as “FLSA”): “All individuals in the United States who participated in
8 some or all of Defendants’ initial 3-5 day training sessions to become a Sales Representative from
9 three years prior to the filing of the Complaint until final judgment is rendered. Excluded from the
10 FLSA Class are any individuals who opted into the FLSA Class in the matter of Harris v. Vector
11 Marketing Corp., Civil Action Number 08-5198, before the United States District Court for the
12 Northern District of California” (“Putative Collective Action Members”);
13
C.
Plaintiffs desire to timely seek conditional collective action certification of Plaintiffs’
14 FLSA claims on behalf of the Putative Collective Action Members, which Defendant expects to
15 oppose;
16
D.
The parties have agreed to file cross-motions for summary judgment or summary
17 adjudication as to the Plaintiffs’ individual claims prior to Plaintiffs moving for conditional
18 collective action certification;
19
E.
The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment or summary adjudication are
20 currently scheduled to be heard on November 20, 2014; and
21
F.
Plaintiffs wish to toll the statute of limitations on the claims of Putative Collective
22 Action Members pending the Court’s disposition of the Parties’ cross-motions for summary
23 judgment or summary adjudication, and Defendant is agreeable to such tolling on the terms set forth
24 below.
25
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, through
26 their respective counsel of record, as follows:
27
1.
The statute of limitations shall be tolled as to all claims under the FSLA alleged in the
28 Complaint on behalf of Putative Collective Action Members from May 15, 2014, through and
-2-
Stipulated Tolling Agreement and [Proposed] Order
Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC
1 including the date the Court files its Order(s) disposing of the Parties’ cross-motions for summary
2 judgment or summary adjudication; provided, however, that this Stipulation shall have no force or
3 effect as to any claims of Putative Collective Action Members as to which the statute of limitations
4 had run as of May 15, 2014; and
5
2.
This Stipulation is without prejudice to any of Defendant’s defenses or other rights in
6 this action, including (without limitation) the right to assert the statute of limitations as a defense
7 except as set forth in Paragraph 1 above.
8
SO STIPULATED.
9 DATED: August 27, 2014
MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP
DIVERSITY LAW GROUP APC
10
11
By:
12
13
/s/ Christina A. Humphrey
Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq.
Christina A. Humphrey, Esq.
Leslie H. Joyner, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
14
15
DATED: August 27, 2014
MORRISON & FOERSTER
PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP
16
By:
17
18
19
/s/ Karen J. Kubin
Karen J. Kubin
Attorneys for Defendant
Vector Marketing Corporation
20
21
22
SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
23 document has been obtained from the signatories on this e-filed document.
24
25
DATED: August 27, 2014
/s/ Christina A. Humphrey
Christina A. Humphrey
26
27
/s/ Karen J. Kubin
Karen J. Kubin
28
-3-
Stipulated Tolling Agreement and [Proposed] Order
Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC
[Proposed] ORDER
1
Good cause appearing, the Parties’ Stipulated Tolling Agreement set forth above is hereby
10
ER
R NIA
FO
dwa
Judge E
H
9
hen
rd M. C
RT
8
United States District Judge
NO
7
VED
Honorable
APPRO Edward M. Chen
LI
6
UNIT
ED
9/5/14
5 DATED: _______________
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
4
S
3 approved and made an Order of the Court.
A
2
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4-
Stipulated Tolling Agreement and [Proposed] Order
Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?