Woods et al v. Vector Marketing Corporation

Filing 55

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 53 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulated Tolling Agreement and Proposed Order filed by Samuel Barone-Crowell, Dominic Seale, Casey McCaleb, Eric Essler, Wesley Varughese, William Woods, Lowell Harvard Jr.. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/5/14. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/5/2014)

Download PDF
1 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. (SBN 090058) 2 Christina Humphrey, Esq. (SBN 226326) Leslie H. Joyner, Esq. (SBN 2627050 3 29229 Canwood Street, Suite 208 Agoura Hills, California 91301 (818) 991-8080 Facsimile: (818) 991-8081 5 ssaltzman@marlinsaltzman.com chumphrey@marlinsaltzman.com 6 ljoyner@marlinsaltzman.com 4 Telephone: 7 DIVERSITY LAW GROUP, A Professional Corporation Larry W. Lee, Esq. (SBN 228175) 8 550 S. Hope St., Suite 2655 Los Angeles, California 90071 9 Telephone: (213) 488-6555 Facsimile: (213) 488-6554 10 dchang@diversitylaw.com 11 lwlee@diversitylaw.com 12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 WILLIAM WOODS (CA), DOMINIC SEALE 16 17 18 19 20 21 (FL), WESLEY VARUGHESE (IL), ERIC ESSLER (MI), KRISTINA WILLS (MN), CASEY MCCALEB (MO), SAMUEL BARONE-CROWELL (NY), LOWELL HARVARD JR. (NY), ALTWELL WINFIELD (NY), TIFFANY REINHART (OH), individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals, CASE NO. 14-CV-00264-EMC (Hon. Edward M. Chen) STIPULATED TOLLING AGREEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CLASS ACTION Plaintiffs, v. 22 VECTOR MARKETING CORPORATION and 23 DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 24 Defendants. 25 26 27 Plaintiffs William Woods, Dominic Seale, Wesley Varughese, Eric Essler, Casey McCaleb, 28 Samuel Barone-Crowell and Lowell Harvard Jr. (“Plaintiffs”) and Defendant Vector Marketing -1- Stipulated Tolling Agreement and [Proposed] Order Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC 1 Corporation (“Defendant,” or collectively with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”) enter into this Stipulated 2 Tolling Agreement (“Stipulation”) with reference to the following facts: 3 A. On or about January 16, 2014, Plaintiffs filed their Class and Collective Action 4 Complaint (“Complaint”) in the above-captioned action; 5 B. The Complaint alleges various wage and hour violations (all of which are denied by 6 Defendant) on behalf of the following putative class of individuals under the Fair Labor Standards 7 Act (hereinafter referred to as “FLSA”): “All individuals in the United States who participated in 8 some or all of Defendants’ initial 3-5 day training sessions to become a Sales Representative from 9 three years prior to the filing of the Complaint until final judgment is rendered. Excluded from the 10 FLSA Class are any individuals who opted into the FLSA Class in the matter of Harris v. Vector 11 Marketing Corp., Civil Action Number 08-5198, before the United States District Court for the 12 Northern District of California” (“Putative Collective Action Members”); 13 C. Plaintiffs desire to timely seek conditional collective action certification of Plaintiffs’ 14 FLSA claims on behalf of the Putative Collective Action Members, which Defendant expects to 15 oppose; 16 D. The parties have agreed to file cross-motions for summary judgment or summary 17 adjudication as to the Plaintiffs’ individual claims prior to Plaintiffs moving for conditional 18 collective action certification; 19 E. The parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment or summary adjudication are 20 currently scheduled to be heard on November 20, 2014; and 21 F. Plaintiffs wish to toll the statute of limitations on the claims of Putative Collective 22 Action Members pending the Court’s disposition of the Parties’ cross-motions for summary 23 judgment or summary adjudication, and Defendant is agreeable to such tolling on the terms set forth 24 below. 25 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, through 26 their respective counsel of record, as follows: 27 1. The statute of limitations shall be tolled as to all claims under the FSLA alleged in the 28 Complaint on behalf of Putative Collective Action Members from May 15, 2014, through and -2- Stipulated Tolling Agreement and [Proposed] Order Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC 1 including the date the Court files its Order(s) disposing of the Parties’ cross-motions for summary 2 judgment or summary adjudication; provided, however, that this Stipulation shall have no force or 3 effect as to any claims of Putative Collective Action Members as to which the statute of limitations 4 had run as of May 15, 2014; and 5 2. This Stipulation is without prejudice to any of Defendant’s defenses or other rights in 6 this action, including (without limitation) the right to assert the statute of limitations as a defense 7 except as set forth in Paragraph 1 above. 8 SO STIPULATED. 9 DATED: August 27, 2014 MARLIN & SALTZMAN, LLP DIVERSITY LAW GROUP APC 10 11 By: 12 13 /s/ Christina A. Humphrey Stanley D. Saltzman, Esq. Christina A. Humphrey, Esq. Leslie H. Joyner, Esq. Attorneys for Plaintiffs 14 15 DATED: August 27, 2014 MORRISON & FOERSTER PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP 16 By: 17 18 19 /s/ Karen J. Kubin Karen J. Kubin Attorneys for Defendant Vector Marketing Corporation 20 21 22 SIGNATURE ATTESTATION In accordance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this 23 document has been obtained from the signatories on this e-filed document. 24 25 DATED: August 27, 2014 /s/ Christina A. Humphrey Christina A. Humphrey 26 27 /s/ Karen J. Kubin Karen J. Kubin 28 -3- Stipulated Tolling Agreement and [Proposed] Order Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC [Proposed] ORDER 1 Good cause appearing, the Parties’ Stipulated Tolling Agreement set forth above is hereby 10 ER R NIA FO dwa Judge E H 9 hen rd M. C RT 8 United States District Judge NO 7 VED Honorable APPRO Edward M. Chen LI 6 UNIT ED 9/5/14 5 DATED: _______________ S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 4 S 3 approved and made an Order of the Court. A 2 N F D IS T IC T O R C 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -4- Stipulated Tolling Agreement and [Proposed] Order Case No. 14-CV-00264-EMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?