Garrison et al v. Whole Foods Market California, Inc. et al

Filing 48

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 47 Stipulation for Limited Modification of Scheduling Order.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Jay W. Connolly (SBN 114725)
[e-mail]
Giovanna A. Ferrari (SBN 229871)
[e-mail]
Joseph J. Orzano (SBN 262040)
[e-mail]
560 Mission Street, 31st Floor
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendants
WHOLE FOODS MARKET CALIFORNIA, INC. and
MRS. GOOCH’S NATURAL FOOD MARKETS,
INC.

9
10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

13
14
15

MARY GARRISON and GRACE
GARRISON, individually, and on behalf of all
others similarly situated,

16

Plaintiffs,

17
18

Case No. 3:14-CV-00334-VC
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR LIMITED
MODIFICATION TO SCHEDULING
ORDER

v.
WHOLE FOODS MARKET CALIFORNIA,
INC., et al.s

19
Defendants.
20
21

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiffs MARY GARRISON and GRACE GARRISON,

22

individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated (collectively “Plaintiffs”), on the one

23

hand, and Defendants WHOLE FOODS MARKET CALIFORNIA, INC. and MRS. GOOCH’S

24

NATURAL FOOD MARKETS, INC. (“Defendants”), by and through their undersigned

25

counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:

26
27

WHEREAS, the Court entered an initial scheduling order (“Initial Scheduling Order”)
designating an initial phase of discovery limited to (1) written fact and document discovery

28

Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order and [Proposed] Order / Case No. 3:14-CV-00334-VC

1

targeted to information necessary to prepare for mediation; and (2) the completion of the

2

depositions of Plaintiffs. (Dkt. #41).

3

WHEREAS, the Initial Scheduling Order required this phase of discovery to be

4

completed on or before December 15, 2014 and further required the Parties to complete a

5

mediation on or before February 2, 2015 before reporting back to the Court for a further case

6

management conference on February 10, 2015.

7

WHEREAS, the Parties attempted to resolve certain disputes regarding written discovery

8

without burdening the Court, but required additional time to attempt to resolve them and

9

thereafter take Plaintiffs’ depositions.

10

WHEREAS, on December 12, 2014, pursuant to the Parties’ Stipulation, the Court

11

entered a modified scheduling order (“Modified Scheduled Order”) extending the deadline to

12

complete the current phase of fact discovery to January 16, 2015 for the limited purposes of

13

allowing the parties to: (a) resolve their dispute as to Plaintiffs’ responses to Defendants’ written

14

discovery, including but not limited to Plaintiffs’ document production; and (2) complete the

15

depositions of Plaintiffs. (Dkt. 46.)

16

WHEREAS, the Court also ordered that, to the extent the Parties do not move to compel

17

with respect to any written discovery propounded in this initial phase of discovery prior to the

18

mediation, the Parties reserve the right to move to compel with respect to all such written

19

discovery up to and including 7 days after the close of all fact discovery in the action pursuant to

20

Local Rule 37-3.

21

WHEREAS, the Parties have made progress in their attempts to resolve their disputes

22

regarding written discovery without burdening the Court; however, the Parties require additional

23

time to attempt to attempt to resolve them and thereafter take Plaintiffs’ depositions.

24

WHEREAS, the additional time the Parties seek will not alter the current deadline to

25

complete mediation as the Parties are currently scheduled to participate in a private mediation on

26

February 2, 2015, within the time contemplated in the Scheduling Order.

27

IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED that:

28
2
Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order and [Proposed] Order / Case No. 3:14-CV-00334-VC

1

1.

The deadline to complete the current phase of fact discovery shall be continued

2

from January 16, 2015 to January 30, 2015 for the limited purposes of allowing the parties to:

3

(a) resolve their dispute as to Plaintiffs’ responses to Defendants’ written discovery, including

4

but not limited to Plaintiffs’ document production; and (2) complete the depositions of Plaintiffs.

5

2.

To the extent the Parties do not move to compel with respect to any written

6

discovery propounded in this initial phase of discovery prior to the mediation, the Parties reserve

7

the right to move to compel with respect to all such written discovery up to and including 7 days

8

after the close of all fact discovery in the action pursuant to Local Rule 37-3.

9
10

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
DATED: January 16, 2015

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP

11
12

By: /s/ Joseph J. Orzano
Jay W. Connolly
Giovanna A. Ferrari
Joseph J. Orzano

13
14

Attorneys for Defendants
WHOLE FOODS MARKET CALIFORNIA,
INC. and MRS. GOOCH’S NATURAL FOOD
MARKETS, INC.

15
16
17

DATED: January 16, 2015

SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC

18
19

By: /s/ Molly A. Desario
Matthew R. Bainer
Molly a. DeSario

20
21

Attorneys for Plaintiffs
MARY GARRISON and GRACE
GARRISON, individually and on behalf of all
other similarly situated

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order and [Proposed] Order / Case No. 3:14-CV-00334-VC

1
2
3

[PROPOSED] ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
1.

The deadline to complete the current phase of initial fact discovery shall be

4

continued to January 30, 2015 for the limited purposes of allowing the parties to: (a) resolve

5

their dispute as to Plaintiffs’ responses to Defendants’ written discovery, including but not

6

limited to Plaintiffs’ document production; and (2) complete the depositions of Plaintiffs.

7

2.

To the extent the Parties do not move to compel with respect to any written

8

discovery prior to the mediation, the Parties shall be permitted to move to compel with respect to

9

any written discovery up to and including 7 days after the close of all fact discovery in the action

10

pursuant to Local Rule 37-3, or as otherwise ordered by the Court. It shall be sufficient to satisfy

11

this deadline to move to compel that the Parties submit the joint letter brief required in paragraph

12

9 of this Court’s civil standing order by the motion to compel deadline.

13
14

January 27, 2015
DATED: _________________

_____________________________
HON. VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Court Judge

15
16

18674736v.1

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order and [Proposed] Order / Case No. 3:14-CV-00334-VC