Garrison et al v. Whole Foods Market California, Inc. et al

Filing 52

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 51 Stipulation for Limited Modification to Scheduling Order.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Jay W. Connolly (SBN 114725) jconnolly@seyfarth.com Giovanna A. Ferrari (SBN 229871) gferrari@seyfarth.com Joseph J. Orzano (SBN 262040) jorzano@seyfarth.com 560 Mission Street, 31st Floor San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 397-2823 Facsimile: (415) 397-8549 Attorneys for Defendants WHOLE FOODS MARKET CALIFORNIA, INC. and MRS. GOOCH’S NATURAL FOOD MARKETS, INC. 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 MARY GARRISON and GRACE GARRISON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 16 Plaintiffs, 17 18 Case No. 3:14-CV-00334-VC STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR LIMITED MODIFICATION TO SCHEDULING ORDER v. WHOLE FOODS MARKET CALIFORNIA, INC., et al., 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(b), Plaintiffs MARY GARRISON and GRACE GARRISON, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated (collectively “Plaintiffs”), on the one hand, and Defendants WHOLE FOODS MARKET CALIFORNIA, INC. and MRS. GOOCH’S NATURAL FOOD MARKETS, INC. (collectively “Defendants”), by and through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, on February 11, 2015, the Court entered a minute entry setting forth several case deadlines consistent with the Parties’ most recent Joint Case Management Conference 28 Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order and [Proposed] Order / Case No. 3:14-cv-00334-VC 1 Statement, including the requirement that the Parties submit a stipulated ESI Protocol or letter 2 brief outlining any dispute regarding the ESI Protocol by March 3, 2015. (Dkt. 50.) 3 WHEREAS, Defendants have represented that since Defendants agreed to the proposed 4 schedule, the ESI specialist dedicated to this case became ill and was out of the office and indeed 5 hospitalized and as a result Defendants were delayed in preparing the draft ESI Protocol for 6 Plaintiffs’ review and comment. Defendants have since drafted a proposed ESI Protocol and 7 provided it to Plaintiffs for their review on March 2, 2015. 8 9 10 11 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs desire additional time to review and comment on Defendants’ proposed ESI Protocol and Defendant do not oppose Plaintiffs’ request. WHEREAS, the additional time the Parties seek to attempt to reach agreement on an ESI Protocol without involvement by the Court will not alter any other case deadlines. 12 IT IS THEREFORE STIPULATED that: 13 1. 14 The deadline to submit a stipulated ESI Protocol or letter brief outlining any dispute regarding the ESI Protocol is extended from March 3, 2015 to March 17, 2015. 15 2. 16 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 17 All other case deadlines remain unchanged. DATED: March 3, 2015 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 18 By: /s/ Joseph J. Orzano Jay W. Connolly Giovanna A. Ferrari Joseph J. Orzano 19 20 Attorneys for Defendants WHOLE FOODS MARKET CALIFORNIA, INC. and MRS. GOOCH’S NATURAL FOOD MARKETS, INC. 21 22 23 DATED: March 3, 2015 SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC 24 By: /s/ Molly A. Desario Matthew R. Bainer Molly a. DeSario 25 26 Attorneys for Plaintiffs MARY GARRISON and GRACE GARRISON, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated 27 28 2 Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order and [Proposed] Order / Case No. 3:14-cv-00334-VC 1 2 3 4 5 [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 1. The deadline to submit a stipulated ESI Protocol or letter brief outlining any dispute regarding the ESI Protocol is extended from March 3, 2015 to March 17, 2015. 2. All other case deadlines remain unchanged. 6 7 8 March 5, 2015 DATED: _________________ HON. VINCE CHHABRIA United States District Court Judge 9 10 19182373v.1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Stipulation to Modify Scheduling Order and [Proposed] Order / Case No. 3:14-cv-00334-VC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?