Lockett et al v. AO Smith Corporation et al

Filing 307

ORDER, granting 298 STIPULATION for Dismissal as to Defendant Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation filed by Charles P. Lockett, Dori Lockett. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 6/12/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/17/2014)

Download PDF
1 Ethan A. Horn 2 3 4 5 CA Bar No. 190296 Ron G. Archer CA Bar No. 189429 Matthew P. Juhren CA Bar No. 292429 NAPOLI BERN RIPKA SHKOLNIK & ASSOCIATES, LLP 111 Corporate Drive Ladera Ranch, CA 92694 Telephone: 949-234-6032 Facsimile: 949-429-0892 6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 CHARLES P. LOCKETT and Case No. 3:14-cv-00379-CRB DORI LOCKETT, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 vs. 15 A.O SMITH CORPORATION, et al., 16 Defendant. ORDER DISMISSING ALL CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFFS AGAINST DEFENDANT FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION Judge: Honorable Charles R. Breyer 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DISMISSING ALL CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFFS AGAINST DEFENDANT FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION - 1 3:14-CV-00379-CRB 1 2 ORDER 3 Having reviewed the Motion to Dismiss all claims of Plaintiffs against Defendant FOSTER 4 WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION with prejudice, the Court orders as follows: 5 1. The claims by Plaintiffs Charles Lockett and Dori Lockett against Defendant Foster 6 Wheeler Energy Corporation are hereby dismissed with prejudice; 2. The parties will bear their own fees and costs. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 S FO LI ER H 14 RT 13 NO 12 _____________________ RED E Hon. Charles S SO ORD T I R. Breyer I U.S. District Court Northern District of California . Breyer harles R Judge C A 11 UNIT ED 10 Dated: June 12, 2014 RT U O 9 S DISTRICT TE C TA R NIA 7 N F D IS T IC T O R C 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER DISMISSING ALL CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFFS AGAINST DEFENDANT FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION - 2 3:14-CV-00379-CRB

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?