Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Garwood

Filing 31

ORDER RESOLVING DISPUTE OVER LOAN FILES re 29 Letter. I ORDER counsel for the FDIC, with input from defendants, to develop a protocol for the expeditious, cost-effective review of the records by the defendants. The FDIC shall invoice the defenda nts for its entire cost of the review, including obtaining the boxes from storage and monitoring defendants' review of same, and defendants shall pay the FDIC within 30 days of their receipt of the invoice. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/06/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, 8 Plaintiff, 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 Case No. 14-cv-00390-WHO ORDER RESOLVING DISPUTE OVER LOAN FILES v. MARK GARWOOD, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 29 Defendants. The parties submitted a joint letter over their discovery dispute involving the production of 13 the eighteen loan files at issue in this case. I take the FDIC at its word that it has done its best to 14 provide all of the relevant documents. Given its representation that when the FDIC entered the 15 bank as receiver in April 2010, it found loan files on people’s desks and in the shredder bin, the 16 apparent jumbled state of the records is not surprising. The FDIC’s offer to provide (i) access to 17 its database or a hard drive containing the entire contents of the scanned database, (ii) a detailed 18 index of the contents of the boxes that was prepared at the time the documents were gathered, and 19 (iii) an expert to help perform electronic searches is more than reasonable. 20 Defendants have rejected the FDIC’s offers and insist that they need to see the hard copies 21 of the files in order to recreate the loan files in their entirety. It is not obvious why this could not 22 be done more efficiently from the index and database. However, given the importance of the 23 24 25 26 27 28 documents and the insistence of defendants, they may review the hard copies of the documents at their expense. I ORDER counsel for the FDIC, with input from defendants, to develop a protocol for the expeditious, cost-effective review of the records by the defendants. The FDIC shall invoice the defendants for its entire cost of the review, including obtaining the boxes from storage 1 and monitoring defendants’ review of same, and defendants shall pay the FDIC within 30 days of 2 their receipt of the invoice. 3 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: June 6, 2014 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge 8 9 10 United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?