Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Garwood
Filing
31
ORDER RESOLVING DISPUTE OVER LOAN FILES re 29 Letter. I ORDER counsel for the FDIC, with input from defendants, to develop a protocol for the expeditious, cost-effective review of the records by the defendants. The FDIC shall invoice the defenda nts for its entire cost of the review, including obtaining the boxes from storage and monitoring defendants' review of same, and defendants shall pay the FDIC within 30 days of their receipt of the invoice. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 06/06/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/6/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION,
8
Plaintiff,
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
Case No. 14-cv-00390-WHO
ORDER RESOLVING DISPUTE OVER
LOAN FILES
v.
MARK GARWOOD, et al.,
Re: Dkt. No. 29
Defendants.
The parties submitted a joint letter over their discovery dispute involving the production of
13
the eighteen loan files at issue in this case. I take the FDIC at its word that it has done its best to
14
provide all of the relevant documents. Given its representation that when the FDIC entered the
15
bank as receiver in April 2010, it found loan files on people’s desks and in the shredder bin, the
16
apparent jumbled state of the records is not surprising. The FDIC’s offer to provide (i) access to
17
its database or a hard drive containing the entire contents of the scanned database, (ii) a detailed
18
index of the contents of the boxes that was prepared at the time the documents were gathered, and
19
(iii) an expert to help perform electronic searches is more than reasonable.
20
Defendants have rejected the FDIC’s offers and insist that they need to see the hard copies
21
of the files in order to recreate the loan files in their entirety. It is not obvious why this could not
22
be done more efficiently from the index and database. However, given the importance of the
23
24
25
26
27
28
documents and the insistence of defendants, they may review the hard copies of the documents at
their expense. I ORDER counsel for the FDIC, with input from defendants, to develop a protocol
for the expeditious, cost-effective review of the records by the defendants. The FDIC shall
invoice the defendants for its entire cost of the review, including obtaining the boxes from storage
1
and monitoring defendants’ review of same, and defendants shall pay the FDIC within 30 days of
2
their receipt of the invoice.
3
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 6, 2014
______________________________________
WILLIAM H. ORRICK
United States District Judge
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?