Barragan v. Personniq, LLC et al
Filing
40
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANT RIX SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED Plaintiff is ordered to show cause, in writing and no later than October 10, 2014, why plaintiff's claims against Steven Rix should not be dismissed for failure to serve within the time required by Rule 4(m). Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on September 17, 2014. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/17/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
11
PEDRO BARRAGAN,
No. 14-0475 MMC
Plaintiff,
12
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO
SHOW CAUSE WHY CLAIMS AGAINST
DEFENDANT RIX SHOULD NOT BE
DISMISSED
v.
13
14
PERSONNIQ, LLC; JIM PRENDERGAST;
and STEVEN RIX,
Defendants.
15
/
16
17
On July 30, 2013, plaintiff filed the instant action in the Sonoma County Superior
18
Court, naming Personniq, LLC; Jim Prendergast, and Steven Rix as defendants. On
19
January 31, 2014, the instant action was removed to the federal district court. To date,
20
plaintiff has not filed proof of service of the summons and complaint upon defendant Steven
21
Rix. “If a defendant is not served within 120 days after the complaint is filed, the court – on
22
motion or on its own after notice to the plaintiff – must dismiss the action without prejudice
23
against that defendant or order that service be made within a specified time,” Fed. R. Civ.
24
P. 4(m), and where, as here, the complaint is removed from state court, the 120-day period
25
runs from the date of removal, see 28 U.S.C. § 1448; Fed. R. Civ. P. 81(c)(1).
26
//
27
//
28
Accordingly, plaintiff is hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing and no
1
later than October 10, 2014, why plaintiff’s claims against Steven Rix should not be
2
dismissed for failure to serve within the time required by Rule 4(m).
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: September 17, 2014
MAXINE M. CHESNEY
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?