Sciortino et al v. Pepsico, Inc.

Filing 118

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 116 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Private ADR by Pepsico, Inc. filed by Pepsico, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 7/28/15. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/28/2015)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Stacy Sciortino et al.
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
PepsiCo, Inc.

CASE NO. ______________________
14-478-EMC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
Mediation with a private
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
mediator to be identified by the parties.
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
9

October 7, 2015
other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated:___________
07/27/2015

____________________________
/s/ Marc L. Godino
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated:____________
07/27/2015

____________________________
/s/ Christopher Chorba
Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

R NIA

UNIT
ED

__________________________________
. Chen
dward M
Hon. Edward e E
Judg Chen
DISTRICT
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

FO

RT

A

H

ER

LI

7/28/15

DERED

O OR
IT IS S

NO

Dated:

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

9
9

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2