Sciortino et al v. Pepsico, Inc.
Filing
144
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 141 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER to Continue Hearing Date for Motion for Preliminary Approval and Further Case Management Conference filed by Pepsico, Inc. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/21/16. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/21/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
9 STACY SCIORTINO et al.,
10
11
Plaintiffs,
v.
12 PEPSICO, INC.,
13
14
Defendant.
CASE NO. 14-CV-478-EMC, consolidated for
pretrial purposes with Case Nos. 14-713, 141099, 14-1105, 14-1192, 14-1193, 14-1316,
14-2023
PUTATIVE CLASS ACTION
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE
HEARING DATE FOR MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF
SETTLEMENT
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR MOTION
FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT
Case No. 14-CV-00478
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Having considered the parties’ Joint Stipulation To Continue Hearing Date For Motion For
3 Preliminary Approval Of Settlement, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby ORDERS that
4 the hearing date on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval (to be filed on April 21, 2016) and
5 Further Case Management Conference is continued from May 26, 2016, at 1:30 p.m., to June 9,
6 2016, at 1:30 p.m.
S
9
April 21, 2016
10 DATED: ______________
FO
13
A
H
ER
LI
RT
12
____________________________________________
.
The HonorableChen
ward M Edward M. Chen
udge Ed States District Court Judge
J United
NO
11
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
R NIA
IT IS SO ORDERED.
UNIT
ED
8
RT
U
O
7
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE FOR MOTION
FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT
Case No. 14-CV-00478
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?