Sciortino et al v. Pepsico, Inc.
Filing
78
ORDER Re 70 Plaintiffs' Proposed Guidelines to Limit Costs and Expenses. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 9/18/2014. (emcsec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
STACY SCIORTINO, et al.,
9
Plaintiffs,
v.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
PEPSICO, INC.,
12
Defendant.
___________________________________/
13
No. C-14-0478 EMC
CONSOLIDATED CASES
No. C-14-0713 EMC
No. C-14-1099 EMC
No. C-14-1105 EMC
No. C-14-1192 EMC
No. C-14-1193 EMC
No. C-14-1316 EMC
No. C-14-2023 EMC
14
ORDER RE PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED
GUIDELINES TO LIMIT COSTS AND
EXPENSES
15
16
(Docket No. 70)
17
18
19
Pursuant to the Court’s order (Docket No. 65), co-lead counsel in the Sciortino matter has
20
filed proposed guidelines as to costs and expenses, including attorney’s fees. See Docket No. 70.
21
The Court has reviewed the proposed guidelines and hereby adopts them. Any costs or expenses
22
that fall outside the guidelines set forth in Docket No. 70 shall be presumed unreasonable and shall
23
not be compensable in any award of fees or costs.
24
In adopting the guidelines set forth in Docket No. 70, the Court does not deem costs or
25
expenses that fall within the limitations to be presumptively reasonable. The Court reminds counsel
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
that it retains authority to evaluate the reasonableness of any costs or expenses requested by class
2
counsel. Fees or costs that technically fall within the letter of the guidelines, but that are duplicative,
3
unnecessary, or otherwise unreasonable, shall not be approved.
4
This order disposes of Docket No. 70.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
7
8
Dated: September 18, 2014
9
_________________________
EDWARD M. CHEN
United States District Judge
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?