Cheng v. Winco Foods, LLC et al

Filing 39

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 32 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by Winco Foods, LLC, Winco Holdings, Inc and Plaintiff filed by Winco Holdings, Inc, Winco Foods, LLC. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 22, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/22/2014)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHYLLIS W. CHENG, in her official capacity
as DIRECTOR OF THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF FAIR EMPLOYMENT CASE NO. CV-14-00483 JST
AND HOUSING, an agency of the State of
California, on behalf of Real Parties in Interest STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
and all Similarly Situated Individuals,
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Plaintiff(s),
v.
WINCO FOODS, LLC; WINCO
HOLDINGS, INC.
Defendant(s).
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and A.D.R. L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
☐
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
☐
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
X
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
☐
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
☐
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
X

other requested deadline: 150 days from the date of the order referring the case to
mediation.

Dated: April 11, 2014

/s/ Julia L. Montgomery
Attorney for Plaintiff

17118468v.1

.

Dated:April 11, 2014

/s/ Kristina M. Launey
Attorney for Defendants

.

SIGNATURE ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this
document has been obtained from the other signatories.
Dated: April 11, 2014

/s/ Kristina M. Launey
Kristina M. Launey

.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

Dated: April 22, 2014

S

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________________

UNIT
ED

XX
☐
☐

D

IT IS S

17118468v.1

A

H

LI

RT

ER

Ti ga r

FO

NO

n S.
J u d ge J o

R NIA

ERE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
O ORD

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C