Google Inc. v. ContentGuard Holdings, Inc.

Filing 25

ORDER REGARDING STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PLAINTIFFS MOTION TO ENJOIN by Hon. William Alsup re 24 Stipulation.(whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
GOOGLE, INC.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12

No. C 14-00498 WHA

Plaintiff,
v.

13

CONTENTGUARD HOLDINGS, INC.,

14

ORDER REGARDING
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO OPPOSE
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
ENJOIN

Defendant.
/

15
16

On February 19, plaintiff filed a “motion to enjoin defendant from pursuing duplicative

17

litigation,” noticed for April 3 (Dkt. No. 15). On February 25, the parties filed a stipulation

18

seeking to extend defendant’s time to respond to the motion to March 14. Good cause has not

19

been shown to support such an extension. Given the parties’ cooperation, however, defendant’s

20

opposition is due MARCH 12 and the reply is due MARCH 19.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: February 26, 2014.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE