March v. Twin Cities Police Authority et al
Filing
19
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND TO STRIKE 9 10 11 (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 5/9/2014)
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
6
GLEN MARCH,
No. C 14-00512 SI
7
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING AS MOOT
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
AND TO STRIKE
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
v.
TWIN CITIES POLICE AUTHORITY, et. al.,
Defendants.
/
On April 10 and 14, 2014, defendants filed motions to dismiss and motions to strike plaintiff’s
13
complaint. Docket Nos. 9-11. A hearing on the motions is currently scheduled for Friday, June 27,
14
2014 at 9:00 a.m. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that this matter is
15
appropriate for resolution without oral argument and VACATES the hearing. On May 1, 2014, plaintiff
16
filed a first amended complaint, mooting defendants’ motions. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258,
17
1262 (9th Cir. 1992) (“[A]fter amendment the original pleading no longer performs any function and
18
is ‘treated thereafter as non-existent.’”). Accordingly, the Court DENIES as moot defendants’ motions
19
to dismiss and to strike plaintiff’s complaint. Docket Nos. 9-11.
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
Dated: May 9, 2014
24
25
26
27
28
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?