Norcia v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC et al
Filing
202
JUDGMENT. Signed by Judge James Donato on 8/6/2021. ***Civil Case Terminated. (jdlc2S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/6/2021)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
DANIEL NORCIA, on his own behalf
and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
CASE NO. 3:14-cv-582-JD
[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT OF
DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE
vs.
15
16
17
18
SAMSUNG TELECOMMUNICATIONS
AMERICA, LLC, a New York
Corporation, and SAMSUNG
ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., a
New Jersey Corporation,
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE -- CASE NO.: 3:14-CV-582-JD
1
2
3
Terms and phrases in this Judgment will have the same meanings as in the Class Action
Settlement and Release, Dkt. No. 169-1 (the Settlement Agreement).
The Court has personal jurisdiction over all Class Members and subject matter jurisdiction
4
to approve the Settlement Agreement, and final approval of the Settlement Agreement was
5
previously granted. Dkt. No. 199.
6
The Court dismisses this class action against SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA,
7
INC., on the merits and with prejudice, without fees or costs to any party except as provided for
8
in the Settlement Agreement and the Court’s final approval order, Dkt. No. 199, as well as in any
9
other fees and costs orders that may be issued in the future by the Court.
10
The Releases in the Settlement Agreement will become effective as of the Effective Date,
11
and will discharge the Releasees from the Released Claims. The Settlement Agreement is binding
12
on, and will have res judicata and preclusive effect in all pending and future lawsuits or other
13
proceedings maintained by or on behalf of Releasors and the Releasees with respect to the
14
Released Claims. All Class Members who were not excluded by the final approval order are
15
permanently barred and enjoined from filing, intervening, or participating in any lawsuit or other
16
action in any jurisdiction based on the Released Claims.
17
Judgment is entered pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. Without affecting the
18
finality of this Judgment, the Court retains jurisdiction on all matters relating to administration,
19
consummation, implementation, enforcement, and interpretation of the Settlement Agreement and
20
this Judgment, and for any other necessary purpose.
21
22
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED.
23
24
Dated: ___________________
August 6, 2021
__________________________________
25
The Honorable James Donato
26
United States District Judge
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] FINAL JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE -- CASE NO.: 3:14-CV-582-JD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?