California River Watch v. Drakes Bay Oyster Company et al

Filing 30

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 29 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation to Dismiss Action Without Prejudice and [Proposed] Order filed by Drakes Bay Oyster Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/5/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 RACHEL KREVANS (CA SBN 116421) RKrevans@mofo.com CHRISTOPHER J. CARR (CA SBN 184076) CCarr@mofo.com NAVI DHILLON (CA SBN 279537) NDhillon@mofo.com MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 425 Market Street San Francisco, California 94105-2482 Telephone: 415.268.7000 Facsimile: 415.268.7522 Attorneys for Defendants KEVIN J. LUNNY and DRAKES BAY OYSTER COMPANY 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH, Plaintiff, 14 15 16 v. Case No. C 14-00598 EMC STIPULATION TO DISMISS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER KEVIN J. LUNNY; DRAKES BAY OYSTER COMPANY; DOES 1-30, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, Plaintiff California River Watch (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Kevin J. Lunny and Drakes Bay Oyster Company (together “Drakes Bay”), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate to the following: WHEREAS, on October 6, 2014, Drakes Bay and S.M.R. Jewell, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior, filed a Stipulated Request for Approval of Settlement and Entry of Consent Decree (“Settlement”) in the following related action: Drakes Bay Oyster Company, et al. vs. S.M.R. Jewell, et al., Case No. 12-cv-06134 YGR/DMR (N.D. Cal.); WHEREAS, on October 8, 2014, the Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued an order granting the stipulated request for approval of the Settlement and entry of consent decree; 28 STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C 14-00598 EMC sf-3471472 1 1 2 WHEREAS, Plaintiff wishes to dismiss this lawsuit on the ground the terms of the Settlement fully resolve the issues raised by this lawsuit; and 3 WHEREAS, it is agreed that each party will bear its own fees and costs; 4 NOW, THEREFORE, Drakes Bay and Plaintiff respectfully and jointly request that the 5 6 Court enter the accompanying proposed order dismissing this action without prejudice. Respectfully submitted, 7 8 Dated: November 3, 2014 MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 9 10 By: 11 12 13 /s/ Christopher J. Carr CHRISTOPHER J. CARR Attorneys for Defendants KEVIN J. LUNNY and DRAKES BAY OYSTER COMPANY 14 15 16 Dated: November 3, 2014 LAW OFFICE OF JACK SILVER 17 18 By: 19 20 21 /s/ Jack Silver JACK SILVER Attorneys for Plaintiff CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH 22 23 24 25 ECF ATTESTATION I, Christopher J. Carr, hereby attest that Mr. Jack Silver, Esq., concurs in this filing. This attestation is made pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3). 26 27 28 By: /s/ Christopher J. Carr Christopher J. Carr STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C 14-00598 EMC sf-3471472 2 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER In light of the foregoing stipulation and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS 3 the parties’ stipulated request and hereby dismisses this action without prejudice. Each party 4 shall bear its own fees and costs. IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 S ER H 11 R NIA EDWARD M. CHENM. Chen United States Edward Judge Judge District FO RT 10 11/5/14 Dated:________________________ NO 9 DERED O OR IT IS S LI 8 UNIT ED 7 RT U O 6 S DISTRICT TE C TA A 5 N D IS T IC T R OF C 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER C 14-00598 EMC sf-3471472 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?