California River Watch v. Drakes Bay Oyster Company et al
Filing
30
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 29 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation to Dismiss Action Without Prejudice and [Proposed] Order filed by Drakes Bay Oyster Company. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 11/5/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
RACHEL KREVANS (CA SBN 116421)
RKrevans@mofo.com
CHRISTOPHER J. CARR (CA SBN 184076)
CCarr@mofo.com
NAVI DHILLON (CA SBN 279537)
NDhillon@mofo.com
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: 415.268.7000
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Defendants
KEVIN J. LUNNY and
DRAKES BAY OYSTER COMPANY
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH,
Plaintiff,
14
15
16
v.
Case No.
C 14-00598 EMC
STIPULATION TO DISMISS
ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE
AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
KEVIN J. LUNNY; DRAKES BAY OYSTER
COMPANY; DOES 1-30, inclusive,
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, Plaintiff California River Watch
(“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Kevin J. Lunny and Drakes Bay Oyster Company (together “Drakes
Bay”), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate to the following:
WHEREAS, on October 6, 2014, Drakes Bay and S.M.R. Jewell, in her official capacity
as Secretary of Interior, filed a Stipulated Request for Approval of Settlement and Entry of
Consent Decree (“Settlement”) in the following related action: Drakes Bay Oyster Company, et
al. vs. S.M.R. Jewell, et al., Case No. 12-cv-06134 YGR/DMR (N.D. Cal.);
WHEREAS, on October 8, 2014, the Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers issued an order
granting the stipulated request for approval of the Settlement and entry of consent decree;
28
STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
C 14-00598 EMC
sf-3471472
1
1
2
WHEREAS, Plaintiff wishes to dismiss this lawsuit on the ground the terms of the
Settlement fully resolve the issues raised by this lawsuit; and
3
WHEREAS, it is agreed that each party will bear its own fees and costs;
4
NOW, THEREFORE, Drakes Bay and Plaintiff respectfully and jointly request that the
5
6
Court enter the accompanying proposed order dismissing this action without prejudice.
Respectfully submitted,
7
8
Dated: November 3, 2014
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
9
10
By:
11
12
13
/s/ Christopher J. Carr
CHRISTOPHER J. CARR
Attorneys for Defendants
KEVIN J. LUNNY and
DRAKES BAY OYSTER COMPANY
14
15
16
Dated: November 3, 2014
LAW OFFICE OF JACK SILVER
17
18
By:
19
20
21
/s/ Jack Silver
JACK SILVER
Attorneys for Plaintiff
CALIFORNIA RIVER WATCH
22
23
24
25
ECF ATTESTATION
I, Christopher J. Carr, hereby attest that Mr. Jack Silver, Esq., concurs in this filing. This
attestation is made pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3).
26
27
28
By:
/s/ Christopher J. Carr
Christopher J. Carr
STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
C 14-00598 EMC
sf-3471472
2
1
2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
In light of the foregoing stipulation and good cause appearing, the Court hereby GRANTS
3
the parties’ stipulated request and hereby dismisses this action without prejudice. Each party
4
shall bear its own fees and costs.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
S
ER
H
11
R NIA
EDWARD M. CHENM. Chen
United States Edward Judge
Judge District
FO
RT
10
11/5/14
Dated:________________________
NO
9
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
LI
8
UNIT
ED
7
RT
U
O
6
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
A
5
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION RE DISMISSAL AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
C 14-00598 EMC
sf-3471472
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?