Lee v. Thornburg Mortgage Home Loans Inc et al
Filing
58
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE 57 . Case Management Conference reset for 8/20/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/29/14. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
THOMAS A. WOODS (SB #210050)
tawoods@stoel.com
BRYAN L. HAWKINS (SB #238346)
blhawkins@stoel.com
STOEL RIVES LLP
500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 447-0700
Facsimile: (916) 447-4781
Attorneys for Defendant denominated
“BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., (successor by merger
to LaSalle Bank N.A.), as Trustee, on behalf of the
holders of the Thornburg Mortgage Securities Trust
2007-4 Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificates,
Series 2007-4)” and Defendants THORNBURG
MORTGAGE HOME LOANS INC.; TMST HOME
LOANS, INC. FKA THORNBURG MORTGAGE
HOME LOANS INC.; SELECT PORTFOLIO
SERVICING INC.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC., and U.S.
BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (successor to
Bank of America, N.A., successor by merger to
LaSalle Bank N.A.), as Trustee, on behalf of the
holders of the Thornburg Mortgage Securities Trust
2007-4 Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificates,
Series 2007-4
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SUSAN SHELDON LEE, individual, as,
Case No. 3:14-cv-00602-NC
18
Plaintiff,
19
v.
20
21
22
JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING
AN ORDER CONTINUING THE JUNE
11, 2014, CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER
THORNBURG MORTGAGE HOME LOANS
INC; et al.,
Defendants.
23
24
25
26
27
28
S TOE L R IVES LLP
ATTO RNEY S AT LAW
SACRA M E NT O
JOINT STIPULATION
75912356.1 0052161-01464
3:14-CV-00602-NC
TED
NO
s
A
H
ER
M. Cousin
LI
RT
thanael
Judge Na
R NIA
UNIT
ED
GRAN
RT
U
O
May 29, 2014
ISTRIC
ES D
TC
T
TA
FO
, at 2:00 p.m.
S
August 20
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?