Lee v. Thornburg Mortgage Home Loans Inc et al

Filing 58

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE 57 . Case Management Conference reset for 8/20/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 5/29/14. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/29/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 THOMAS A. WOODS (SB #210050) tawoods@stoel.com BRYAN L. HAWKINS (SB #238346) blhawkins@stoel.com STOEL RIVES LLP 500 Capitol Mall, Suite 1600 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 447-0700 Facsimile: (916) 447-4781 Attorneys for Defendant denominated “BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., (successor by merger to LaSalle Bank N.A.), as Trustee, on behalf of the holders of the Thornburg Mortgage Securities Trust 2007-4 Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-4)” and Defendants THORNBURG MORTGAGE HOME LOANS INC.; TMST HOME LOANS, INC. FKA THORNBURG MORTGAGE HOME LOANS INC.; SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC.; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS INC., and U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (successor to Bank of America, N.A., successor by merger to LaSalle Bank N.A.), as Trustee, on behalf of the holders of the Thornburg Mortgage Securities Trust 2007-4 Mortgage Loan Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-4 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SUSAN SHELDON LEE, individual, as, Case No. 3:14-cv-00602-NC 18 Plaintiff, 19 v. 20 21 22 JOINT STIPULATION REQUESTING AN ORDER CONTINUING THE JUNE 11, 2014, CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER THORNBURG MORTGAGE HOME LOANS INC; et al., Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 S TOE L R IVES LLP ATTO RNEY S AT LAW SACRA M E NT O JOINT STIPULATION 75912356.1 0052161-01464 3:14-CV-00602-NC TED NO s A H ER M. Cousin LI RT thanael Judge Na R NIA UNIT ED GRAN RT U O May 29, 2014 ISTRIC ES D TC T TA FO , at 2:00 p.m. S August 20 N D IS T IC T R OF C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?