Senne et al v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, et al
Filing
442
Order by Judge Joseph C. Spero granting third-party discovery, signed on October 14, 2015. (jcslc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
AARON SENNE, et al.,
Case No. 14-cv-00608-JCS
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
COMPEL THIRD-PARTY DISCOVERY
9
KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL
CORP., et al.,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
Defendants.
12
Re: Dkt. No. 441
The Court has reviewed the Joint Letter submitted October 9, 2015 by Plaintiffs and
13
Cleveland Indians Baseball Co., L.P. and Cleveland Indians Baseball Co., Inc. (collectively, the
14
“Cleveland Indians”), and finds the matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument.
15
The Cleveland Indians have been subpoenaed to produce payroll data concerning all absent
16
class members who played for them. Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure commands
17
that the subpoenaing party “must take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or
18
expense on a person subject to the subpoena.” Here, the disclosures Plaintiffs seek are relevant to
19
the issues raised in the upcoming motions for class certification and for decertification. See Dkt.
20
No. 414. The disclosures requested in the subpoena would not impose an undue burden or
21
expense under Rule 45. Nonetheless, Plaintiffs have offered to limit the disclosures to a random
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
sample of thirty-five (35) minor league players per franchise, per year, for each year since 2008.
Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS that:
1. The Cleveland Indians shall produce payroll data for a random sample of thirty-five
(35) minor league players per franchise, per year, for each year since 2008.
2. The Cleveland Indians are ordered to maintain all payroll data for all putative class
members from 2008 to the present, pending further order of the Court.
3. For all other Rule 45 subpoenas (seeking, inter alia, payroll data for the class
1
members in this case) served by Plaintiffs in this matter on non-party franchises,
2
the parties are directed to provide a copy of this Order to all judges before whom
3
motions addressed to those subpoenas are pending or are filed in the future.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 14, 2015
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
Chief Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?