Senne et al v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, et al
Filing
468
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE CERTAIN DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN SUPPORT OF JOINT LETTER BRIEF SHOULD NOT BE DENIED. Defendants may file supplemental declaration in support of request to seal no later than January 6, 2016. Signed by Judge Joseph C. Spero on December 30, 2015. (jcslc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2015)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
AARON SENNE, et al.,
Case No. 14-cv-00608-JCS
Plaintiffs,
8
v.
9
KANSAS CITY ROYALS BASEBALL
CORP., et al.,
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
10
Defendants.
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE
CERTAIN DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL
IN SUPPORT OF JOINT LETTER
BRIEF SHOULD NOT BE DENIED
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
Plaintiffs have filed an Administrative Motion to File Under Seal Certain Documents in
Support of Joint Letter Brief Regarding Defendants‟ Documentary Production and Interrogatory
Responses (“Motion”). See Docket No. 463. In the Motion, Plaintiffs seek to file under seal
deposition excerpts of Shane Turner and Christopher Gwynn on the basis that this testimony was
designated as “Confidential” under the parties‟ Stipulated Protective Order. Pursuant to Civil
Local Rule 79-5(e)(1), Defendants filed a declaration in support of the Motion on December 28,
2015. The declaration states, in relevant part, that the redacted portions of the two depositions:
20
21
22
23
24
25
are . . . entitled to protection under the law because they contain
confidential and proprietary information with respect to the manner
in which the Designating Parties evaluate baseball players, how they
compile those evaluations and the systems where those evaluations
are maintained. Such information is not publicly available.
Docket No. 464 (Bloom Decl.) ¶ 7.
Defendants‟ declaration is not sufficient to meet the “good cause” standard that applies to
26
requests to seal documents filed in connection with discovery disputes. See In re Midland Nat.
27
Life Ins. Co. Annuity Sales Practices Litig., 686 F.3d 1115, 1119 (9th Cir. 2012) (“a particularized
28
showing of „good cause‟ under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) is sufficient to preserve the
1
secrecy of sealed discovery documents attached to non-dispositive motions”). To meet this
2
standard, “the party seeking protection bears the burden of showing specific prejudice or harm will
3
result if no protective order is granted.” Phillips ex rel. Estates of Byrd v. Gen. Motors Corp., 307
4
F.3d 1206, 1210-11 (9th Cir. 2002) (citations omitted). Where a party demonstrates that
5
particularized harm will result from disclosure of information to the public, the court must
6
balance the public and private interests to decide whether protection from disclosure is necessary.
7
Id.
8
“„[S]ources of business information that might harm a litigant‟s competitive standing‟ may
often warrant protection under seal.” In re NCAA Student-Athlete Name & Likeness Licensing
10
Litig., No. 09-CV-01967 CW NC, 2013 WL 1997252, at *1 (N.D. Cal. May 13, 2013) (quoting
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
9
Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 598 (1978)). Here, however, the declaration
12
supplied by Defendants does not identify any harm to their competitive standing that will result
13
from public disclosure of the testimony for which protection is sought. Nor does it identify any
14
other specific harm that will result from its disclosure. As a result, the Court is unable to
15
determine whether there is good cause for permitting the deposition excerpts attached to the
16
Motion to be filed under seal.
17
Defendants may file, no later than January 6, 2016, a supplemental declaration in support
18
of the Motion addressing any specific harm that may result from the public disclosure of the
19
information contained in the redacted portions of the Turner and Gwynn deposition excerpts.
20
Otherwise, the Motion will be denied.
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
25
Dated: December 30, 2015
______________________________________
JOSEPH C. SPERO
Chief Magistrate Judge
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?