Norsworthy v. Beard et al

Filing 60

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 59 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Extend Page Limits for Motions Regarding Preliminary Injunction filed by Michelle-Lael B. Norsworthy. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on February 26, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11
12

JEFFREY B. NORSWORTHY (a/k/a
MICHELLE-LAEL B. NORSWORTHY),

13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.

Case No. 3:14-cv-00695-JST
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO EXTEND PAGE LIMITS
FOR MOTIONS REGARDING
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

15
16
17

JEFFREY BEARD; A. NEWTON; A.
ADAMS; LORI ZAMORA; RAYMOND
J. COFFIN; MARION SPEARMAN;
DAVID VAN LEER; JARED LOZANO;
and DOES 1-30,

18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23

Plaintiff and Defendants (collectively, “Parties”) in the above-captioned case hereby
stipulate as follows:
WHEREAS, on November 11, 2014, the Court issued a stipulated Scheduling Order

24

Regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction setting January 29, 2015 as the deadline

25

for Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Dkt. No. 33);

26

WHEREAS, the Court subsequently revised the briefing schedule upon stipulation of the

27

Parties, setting February 26, 2015 as the deadline for Plaintiff to file her Motion for Preliminary

28

Injunction and March 12, 2015 as the deadline for Defendants to file their opposition (Dkt. No.

MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

1

SAN FRANCISCO

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
DB2/ 25764609.1

Case No. 3:14-cv-00695-JST

1
2

48);
WHEREAS, Plaintiff believes – and Defendants do not oppose – that good cause exists to

3

extend the page limitations provided in the Local Rules for the briefing on Plaintiff’s Motion for

4

Preliminary Injunction;

5

NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12, IT IS HEREBY

6

STIPULATED by and between all parties to this action, through their undersigned counsel of

7

record, as follows:

8
9
10
11

1.

Plaintiff’s memorandum of points and authorities in support of her Motion for

Preliminary Injunction may be up to 30 pages in length.
2.

Defendants’ memorandum of points and authorities in opposition to Plaintiff’s

Motion for Preliminary Injunction may be up to 30 pages in length.

12
13
14

IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Dated: February 25, 2015

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP

15

By /s/ Herman Hoying
Herman Hoying

16

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
One Market, Spear Street Tower
San Francisco, California 94105-1126
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.442.1001
[e-mail]

17
18
19
20

Attorneys for Plaintiff
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

2

SAN FRANCISCO

DB2/ 25764609.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 3:14-cv-00695-JST

1
Dated: February 25, 2015

KAMALA D. HARRIS
Attorney General of California

2
3

By /s/ Preeti K. Bajwa
Preeti K. Bajwa

4

Deputy Attorney General
455 Golden Gate Ave., Suite 11000
San Francisco, California 94102-7004
Telephone:[phone]
Facsimile: 415.703.5843
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8

Attorneys for Defendants

9
10
11
12
13

FILER’S ATTESTATION
I, Herman Hoying, am the ECF User whose identification and password are
being used to file this Stipulation. Pursuant to Local Civil Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby
attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has
been obtained from Defendants’ counsel.

14
15
16

Dated: February 25, 2015

MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP
By:

17

/s/ Herman Hoying
Herman Hoying
Attorneys for Plaintiff

18
19
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

S

UNIT
ED

22

ERED

NO

25

RT

ER

H

26

n
J u d ge J o

27
28

S . Ti ga r

FO

24

R NIA

RD
____________________________________
IS SO O
THon. Jon S. Tigar
I
Judge of the Northern District of California

26
Dated: February ___, 2015

LI

23

RT
U
O

21

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

A

20

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

MORGAN, LEWIS &
BOCKIUS LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

3

SAN FRANCISCO

DB2/ 25764609.1

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 3:14-cv-00695-JST