Jones v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 34

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE 32 . Case Management Conference set for 9/10/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 7/22/2014. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/22/2014)

1
2
3
4
5

Kenneth N. Frucht (SBN 178881)
Frederick J. Geonetta (SBN 114824)
GEONETTA & FRUCHT, LLP
100 Montgomery Street, Suite 1600
San Francisco, CA 94104
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Travis Jones

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

TRAVIS JONES,

No. C14-00733 NC

Plaintiffs
v.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL
CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,
SERGEANT DION MCDONNELL, DEPUTY
[Civil L.R. 6-2, 7-12, 16-2(e)]
SHERIFF JAMES BOSWELL and DOES 125, inclusive.
Crtrm: A, 15th Floor
Defendants.
Judge: Hon. Nathanael Presiding
Date Action Filed: February 18, 2014
Trial Date: None Assigned
STIPULATION

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2, 7-12 and 16-2(e), Plaintiff TRAVIS JONES, by and through
his attorney of record, Kenneth Frucht of Geonetta & Frucht LLP, Defendants CONTRA COSTA
COUNTY and JAMES BOSWELL, by and through their attorney of record, Deputy County Counsel
Nima E. Sohi of the Contra Costa County Counsel’s Office (the “Contra Costa Defendants”), and
Defendants CITY AND COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO AND SERGEANT DION MCDONNELL,
by and through their attorney of record, Deputy City Attorney James F. Hannawalt of the San
Francisco City Attorney’s Office (the “San Francisco Defendants”), hereby stipulate that the initial
Case Management Conference (“CMC”) currently scheduled to take place on July 30, 2014 at 10:00
_____________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. C14-00733 NC

1

1
2

a.m., be continued to September 10, 2014 at 10:00 a.m.
Good cause exists to continue the date of the initial CMC, including preparing the Joint CMC

3

Statement and Proposed Order per Civil Local Rule 16-9, and other associated deadlines, because the

4

Contra Costa Defendants and the San Francisco Defendants have all filed motions to dismiss, and

5

these motions are set to be heard on August 27, 2014. The resolution of the motions to dismiss may

6

narrow the issues in this case, which would effect the preparation of the Joint CMC Statement and

7

Proposed Order, and the continuance would allow the parties sufficient time before the CMC to

8

submit to the Court a Joint CMC Statement. The parties have previously stipulated to a continuance

9

of the initial case management conference pending Plaintiff’s filing of an amended complaint. No

10

prejudice will result to any party as a result of a continuance of the CMC.

11

SO STIPULATED.

12

DATED: July 21, 2014

GEONETTA & FRUCHT, LLP

13
By:

14
15

/s/
KENNETH FRUCHT
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TRAVIS JONES

16
17

DATED: July 21, 2014

18

SHARON L. ANDERSON, County Counsel
By:

19
20
21
22

DATED: July 21, 2014

/s/
NIMA E. SOHI
Deputy County Counsel
Attorneys for Defendants
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
and JAMES BOSWELL
DENNIS J. HERRERA, City Attorney

23
24
25
26
27
28

By:

/s/
JAMES F. HANNAWALT
Deputy City Attorney
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
AND SERGEANT DION MCDONNELL

_____________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. C14-00733 NC

2

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

10

14

thanael
Judge Na

ER

M. Cousin

H

13

RT

12

HON. NATHANIEL COUSINS
ERED
O ORD Judge
UnitedIStates S
T IS Magistrate

NO

11

July 22, 2014

UNIT
ED

9

DATED:

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

8

S

7

R NIA

5

2014 at 10:00 a.m. with the associated deadlines continued accordingly.

s

FO

4

Court hereby ORDERS that the initial Case Management Conference be continued to September 10,

LI

3

Having considered the stipulation filed by the parties, and good cause appearing, the

A

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

_____________________________________________________________________________
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. C14-00733 NC

3