Jones v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 45

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR CONFERENCE 44 . Initial Case Management Conference set for 12/10/2014 10:00 AM in Courtroom A, 15th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Nathanael Cousins on 8/28/2014. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6

DENNIS J. HERRERA, State Bar #139669
City Attorney
CHERYL ADAMS, State Bar #164194
Chief Trial Deputy
JAMES F. HANNAWALT, State Bar #139657
Deputy City Attorneys
Fox Plaza
1390 Market Street, Sixth Floor
San Francisco, California 94102-5408
Telephone: [phone] [Hannawalt]
Facsimile:
[phone]
E-Mail:
[e-mail]

7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and
SGT. DION MCDONNELL

10
11
12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

TRAVIS JONES,

15

Plaintiff,

16

Case No. CV 14-00733 NC

vs.

17
18
19

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO CONTINUE INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND ADR
CONFERENCE

CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN
FRANCISCO, CONTRA COSTA COUNTY,
SERGEANT DION MCDONNELL, DEPUTY
SHERIFF JONES and DOES 1-25, inclusive,

Trial Date:

Not Set

Defendants.

20
21
22

STIPULATION

23

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2, 7-12 and 16-2(e), Plaintiff TRAVIS JONES, by his attorney

24

Kenneth Frucht of the law firm of Geonetta & Frucht, LLP, Defendants CONTRA COSTA COUNTY

25

and JAMES BOSWELL, by their attorney Deputy County Counsel Nima Sohi of the Contra Costa

26

County Counsel’s Office, and Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and

27

SERGEANT DION MCDONNELL, by their attorney Deputy City Attorney James Hannawalt of the

28

San Francisco City Attorney’s Office, hereby stipulate that the initial case management conference
STIPULATION & PROP ORDER TO CONT. INITIAL
CMC & ADR CONF.;CASE NO. CV 14-00733

1

n:\lit\li2014\141153\00952703.doc

1

(“CMC”) currently scheduled for September 10, 2014, at 10 a.m. should be re-scheduled to

2

December 10, 2014 at 10 am, or to another date more convenient to the court; and that the ADR

3

telephone conference now scheduled for September 2, 2014, should be rescheduled to a date within

4

two weeks before the new CMC date that is convenient to all counsel and the ADR coordinator.

5

Good cause exists to continue the initial CMC, including preparing the Joint CMC Statement

6

and Proposed Order per Civil Local Rule 16-9, and other associated deadlines, because the court has

7

granted Defendants’ motions to dismiss with leave to amend and it is anticipated that Plaintiff will file

8

a Second Amended Complaint within the next two weeks, after which Defendants may file further

9

motions or other responsive pleadings. At the present time there is no operative Complaint and it is

10
11
12

anticipated that on September 10, 2014, responsive pleadings may not yet be on file.
SO STIPULATED.
Dated: August 27, 2014
DENNIS J. HERRERA
City Attorney
CHERYL ADAMS
Chief Trial Deputy
JAMES F. HANNAWALT
Deputy City Attorneys

13
14
15
16

By: /s/ James F. Hannawalt
JAMES F. HANNAWALT
Attorneys for Defendants
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and
SERGEANT DION MCDONNELL

17
18
19
20

Dated: August 27, 2014
SHARON L. ANDERSON, County Counsel

21
By: /s/ Nima Sohi
NIMA SOHI
Attorneys for Defendants
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY and DEPUTY JAMES
BOSWELL

22
23
24
25

Dated: August 27, 2014

GEONETTA & FRUCHT, LLP

26
27
28

By: /s/ Kenneth Frucht
KENNETH FRUCHT
Attorneys for Plaintiff
TRAVIS JONES
STIPULATION & PROP ORDER TO CONT. INITIAL
2
CMC & ADR CONF.;CASE NO. CV 14-00733

n:\lit\li2014\141153\00952703.doc

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2

Having considered the stipulation filed by the parties, and good cause appearing, the court

3

hereby ORDERS that the initial case management conference (“CMC”) currently scheduled for

4

September 10, 2014, at 10 a.m. should be re-scheduled to December 10, 2014 at 10 am, or to another

5

date more convenient to the court; and that the ADR telephone conference now scheduled for

6

September 2, 2014, should be rescheduled to a date within two weeks before the new CMC date that

7

is convenient to all counsel and the ADR coordinator.

8

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

S

UNIT
ED

_________________________
HON. NATHANAEL COUSINS
United States NTED Judge
RA Magistrate

12

G

NO

13

RT

14

thanael
Judge Na

15
16

s

A

H

ER

M. Cousin

R NIA

11

FO

DATED:________________________
August 28, 2014

LI

10

RT
U
O

9

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

N

D IS T IC T
R

OF

C

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION & PROP ORDER TO CONT. INITIAL
CMC & ADR CONF.;CASE NO. CV 14-00733

3

n:\lit\li2014\141153\00952703.doc