Roe v. Frito-Lay, Inc.

Filing 104

ORDER by Judge Kandis A. Westmore terminating Plaintiff's 86 Motion for Sanctions. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/9/2016)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JANE ROE,

Case No. 14-cv-00751-HSG (KAW)
Plaintiff,

8

ORDER TERMINATING MOTION FOR
SANCTIONS

v.
9
10

FRITO-LAY, INC.,

Re: Dkt. No. 86

Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

On April 28, 2016, Plaintiff filed a motion for sanctions against Frito Lay for an alleged

14

violation of a prior court order. (Dkt. No. 86.) On May 11, 2016, the parties filed a notice of

15

settlement., so the undersigned vacated the June 2, 2016 hearing on the motion for sanctions and

16

ordered Plaintiff to either file a notice of withdrawal or renotice the motion following the

17

upcoming case management conference. (Dkt. Nos. 93 & 98.) Plaintiff did neither. On August 5,

18

2016, the district court granted the motion for preliminary approval of the class action settlement.

19

(Dkt. No. 103.)

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Accordingly, the Court terminates the pending motion for sanctions. Should Plaintiff
decide to pursue the sanctions motion, she may renotice it.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 9, 2016
__________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge