Roe v. Frito-Lay, Inc.

Filing 37

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. RE CASE DEADLINES RE 36 .(terminating 35 Stipulation, refilled as docket no. 36 ) (ndr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/3/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

JANE ROE,

Case No. 14-cv-00751-HSG
Plaintiff,

8

ORDER RE CASE DEADLINES

v.

Re: Dkt. No. 36

9
10

FRITO-LAY, INC.,
Defendant.

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13

On March 2, 2015, the parties filed a Joint Stipulation to Stay Trial & All Related Dates In

14

Light of Settlement. Given the parties’ intent to settle this dispute privately, the Court will excuse

15

the parties from complying with their obligation to file a joint case management statement.

16

All other court-ordered deadlines and dates remain in place. The parties shall advise the

17

Court if they do not execute a Memorandum of Understanding within the next fourteen days. If,

18

as anticipated, the parties file a motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement within

19

the next sixty days, the Court will consider at that time whether to vacate any pending deadlines.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 3, 2015
______________________________________
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR.
United States District Judge