Roe v. Frito-Lay, Inc.

Filing 65

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 62 Motion to Appear by Telephone for the January 5, 2015 Case Management Conference. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make arrangements for the telephonic appearance. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/30/2015)

Download PDF
1 DHF LAW, P.C. DEVIN H. FOK, Cal. Bar No. 256599 2 234 E. Colorado Blvd., 8th Floor Pasadena, CA 91101 3 Telephone: 310-430-9933 Facsimile: 818-484-2023 4 devin@devinfoklaw.com 5 A NEW WAY OF LIFE REENTRY PROJECT JOSHUA E. KIM, Cal. Bar No. 257260 6 11211 South Western Avenue Los Angeles, California 90047 7 Telephone: 323-563-3575 Facsimile: 323-563-3445 8 Joshua@anewwayoflife.org 9 GIRARDI KEESE V. ANDRE SHERMAN, Cal. Bar No. 198684 10 1126 Wilshire Boulevard Los Angeles, California 90017 11 Telephone: 213-977-0211 Facsimile: 213-481-1554 12 asherman@girardikeese.com 13 Attorneys for Plaintiff JANE ROE and the Proposed Class 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 Case No. 3:14-CV-00751 HSG JANE ROE, Plaintiff, v. FRITO-LAY, INC., a foreign 20 corporation doing business in California, and DOES 1 through 10, 21 inclusive, 22 Defendants. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAD COUNSEL TO APPEAR TELEPHONICALLY AT THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Before the Honorable Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 Lead trial counsel for Plaintiff Roe, Mr. Devin H. Fok is permitted to appear 2 telephonically for the Initial Case Management Conference Set for January 5, 2016 3 at 2:00 p.m. Counsel shall contact CourtCall at (866) 582-6878 to make 4 arrangements for the telephonic appearance. 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: December 30, 2015 10 11 12 UNITED STATES JUDGE HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM JR. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?