Roe v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
Filing
88
ORDER re Unusable Chambers Copies of Plaintiff's 86 MOTION for Sanctions against Defendant Frito-Lay, Inc., filed by Jane Roe. Plaintiff shall lodge a usable copy by May 6, 2016. Signed by Judge Kandis A.Westmore on 5/2/2016. (kawlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2016)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
JANE ROE,
Case No. 14-cv-00751-HSG (KAW)
Plaintiff,
8
ORDER REGARDING UNUSABLE
CHAMBERS COPIES
v.
9
10
FRITO-LAY, INC.,
Re: Dkt. No. 86
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the chambers copy of Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions was
submitted in a format that is not usable by the court.
15
The chambers copy is not usable because it
16
☐
consists of a stack of loose paper wrapped with a rubber band;
17
☐
consists of a stack of loose paper fastened with a binder clip or a paper clip;
18
☐
is too thick to permit secure fastening with a staple, and is fastened with a
brad-type fastener that is too short for the thickness of the document;
19
20
☒
has no tabs for the voluminous exhibits;
21
☐
includes exhibits that are illegible;
22
☐
includes exhibits that are unreadable because the print is too small;
23
☐
includes text and/or footnotes in a font smaller than 12 point;
24
☐
includes portions or exhibits that are redacted because the submitting party
has requested leave to file those portions under seal; or
25
26
27
28
☐
is not usable for another reason –
The paper used for the above-described chambers copy has been recycled by the court.
1
2
Plaintiff shall submit a chambers copy in a format that is usable by the court no later than May 6,
3
2016.
4
5
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 2, 2016
______________________________________
KANDIS A. WESTMORE
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?