Roe v. Frito-Lay, Inc.
Filing
91
ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 89 Stipulated Request for Order Finding Good Cause to Take Depositions Past the Currently-Scheduled Discovery Cut-Off. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2016)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JANE ROE,
Plaintiff,
12
13
Case No. 3:14-CV-00751 HSG
v.
FRITO-LAY, INC., a foreign
14 corporation doing business in California,
and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive,
15
Defendants.
16
17
ORDER FINDING GOOD CAUSE
TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS PAST
THE CURRENTLY-SCHEDULED
DISCOVERY CUT-OFF
Judge: Hon. Haywood Gilliam, Jr.
Courtroom: 15
Trial Date: December 12, 2016
Complaint Filed: December 20, 2013
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SMRH:476942613.1
Case No. 3:14-cv-00751 HSG
[PROPOSED] ORDER FINDING GOOD CAUSE TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS
1
Having consider Plaintif and Defe
g
red
ff
endant’s St
tipulated R
Request for an Order
r
2 Fin
nding Good Cause to Take PMK Deposit
o
tion past th currently
he
y-schedule
ed
3 Di
iscovery Cu
ut-Off, the Court find that goo cause ex
e
ds
od
xists to allo the dep
ow
position of
4 De
efendant Fr
rito-Lay, In
nc.’s Perso Most Kn
on
nowledgea to go f
able
forward pa the
ast
5 cur
rrently-sch
heduled dis
scovery cu
ut-off.
6
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plai
H
D
intiff be pe
ermitted to take the d
deposition
7 of Defendant Person Most know
t’s
wledgeable as ordere by Judg Westmo on
e,
ed
ge
ore
8 Ap 26, 201 (Doc. 83), beyond the curren
pril
16
d
ntly-schedu cut-of date of M 5,
uled
ff
May
9 2016, on or before May 20, 2016.
b
y
10
ated: May 3, 2016
11 Da
12
13
By
14
THE HONO
T
ORABLE HAYWOO S. GIL
OD
LLIAM, JR
R
United St
tates Distri Judge
ict
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SMR
RH:476942613.1
Case No. 3:14-cv-00751 HS
SG
-1
1[PRO
OPOSED] ORD
DER FINDING GOOD CAU TO TAKE DEPOSITION
G
USE
E
NS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?