Roe v. Frito-Lay, Inc.

Filing 91

ORDER by Judge Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr. Granting 89 Stipulated Request for Order Finding Good Cause to Take Depositions Past the Currently-Scheduled Discovery Cut-Off. (ndrS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/3/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JANE ROE, Plaintiff, 12 13 Case No. 3:14-CV-00751 HSG v. FRITO-LAY, INC., a foreign 14 corporation doing business in California, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 ORDER FINDING GOOD CAUSE TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS PAST THE CURRENTLY-SCHEDULED DISCOVERY CUT-OFF Judge: Hon. Haywood Gilliam, Jr. Courtroom: 15 Trial Date: December 12, 2016 Complaint Filed: December 20, 2013 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SMRH:476942613.1 Case No. 3:14-cv-00751 HSG [PROPOSED] ORDER FINDING GOOD CAUSE TO TAKE DEPOSITIONS 1 Having consider Plaintif and Defe g red ff endant’s St tipulated R Request for an Order r 2 Fin nding Good Cause to Take PMK Deposit o tion past th currently he y-schedule ed 3 Di iscovery Cu ut-Off, the Court find that goo cause ex e ds od xists to allo the dep ow position of 4 De efendant Fr rito-Lay, In nc.’s Perso Most Kn on nowledgea to go f able forward pa the ast 5 cur rrently-sch heduled dis scovery cu ut-off. 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plai H D intiff be pe ermitted to take the d deposition 7 of Defendant Person Most know t’s wledgeable as ordere by Judg Westmo on e, ed ge ore 8 Ap 26, 201 (Doc. 83), beyond the curren pril 16 d ntly-schedu cut-of date of M 5, uled ff May 9 2016, on or before May 20, 2016. b y 10 ated: May 3, 2016 11 Da 12 13 By 14 THE HONO T ORABLE HAYWOO S. GIL OD LLIAM, JR R United St tates Distri Judge ict 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SMR RH:476942613.1 Case No. 3:14-cv-00751 HS SG -1 1[PRO OPOSED] ORD DER FINDING GOOD CAU TO TAKE DEPOSITION G USE E NS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?