San Francisco Baykeeper v. Syar Industries Inc
Filing
20
Order vacating case management conference and setting 12/23/14 as the deadline to enter proposed consent decree. Signed by Judge James Donato on 11/6/2014. (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
George Torgun (Bar No. 222085)
SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER
785 Market Street, Suite 850
San Francisco, California 94103
Telephone: (415) 856-0444
Facsimile: (415) 856-0443
Email: george@baykeeper.org
Attorney for Plaintiff:
SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER
7
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
14
15
16
SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, a non-profit
corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
SYAR INDUSTRIES, INC.,
Civil No. C 14-00779 JD
NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST
TO VACATE STATUS CONFERENCE;
[PROPOSED] ORDER
17
18
Defendant.
Honorable James Donato
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Notice of Settlement and Request to Vacate CMC
Civil No. C 14-00779-JD
1
TO THE COURT AND TO THE PARTIES:
2
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff San Francisco Baykeeper (“Baykeeper”) and
3
Defendant Syar Indusries, Inc. (“Syar”) (collectively, the “Parties”) have reached a tentative settlement
4
in this action, which has been executed by the Parties. As required by federal law, a copy of the
5
[Proposed] Consent Decree has been sent to the U.S. Department of Justice and to the U.S.
6
Environmental Protection Agency (collectively, “the Agencies”) for a mandatory 45-day review
7
period under 33 U.S.C. § 1365(c)(3) and 40 C.F.R. § 135.5. Copies of the [Proposed] Consent Decree
8
will be sent to the Agencies via U.S. Certified Mail on today’s date. Upon expiration of the 45-day
9
review period, the Parties will jointly request that the Court (1) approve and execute an Order
10
dismissing the Complaint, and (2) approve and execute the [Proposed] Consent Decree which provides
11
for continuing Court jurisdiction over any disputes which may arise between the parties under the
12
agreement.
13
In light of the 45-day statutory review period, which ends on December 18, 2014, Plaintiff
14
respectfully requests that the Court vacate from its calendar the November 19, 2014 Case Management
15
Conference and associated deadlines, and issue an order that the Parties have until December 23, 2014
16
to file a motion to enter the [Proposed] Consent Decree.
17
18
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests the Court to approve and enter the Proposed
Order below.
19
20
Dated: November 3, 2014
21
Respectfully submitted,
By:
22
23
/s/ George Torgun
George Torgun
Attorney for Plaintiff
SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Notice of Settlement and Request to Vacate CMC
Civil No. C 14-00779-JD
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference set for November 19, 2014
3
and all associated deadlines are vacated. The Court sets December 23, 2014 as the deadline for the
4
Parties to file a motion to enter the [Proposed] Consent Decree.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
S
NO
11
____________________________________
Honorable James Donatoto
na
mes Do
UniteduStatesaDistrict Judge
J d ge J
RT
12
R NIA
10
ERED
O ORD
IT IS S
FO
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
H
ER
LI
Date: ______________
11/6/14
UNIT
ED
8
RT
U
O
7
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
13
14
A
6
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Notice of Settlement and Request to Vacate CMC
Civil No. C 14-00779-JD
C
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?