San Francisco Baykeeper v. Syar Industries Inc

Filing 20

Order vacating case management conference and setting 12/23/14 as the deadline to enter proposed consent decree. Signed by Judge James Donato on 11/6/2014. (jdlc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 George Torgun (Bar No. 222085) SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER 785 Market Street, Suite 850 San Francisco, California 94103 Telephone: (415) 856-0444 Facsimile: (415) 856-0443 Email: george@baykeeper.org Attorney for Plaintiff: SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 14 15 16 SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER, a non-profit corporation, Plaintiff, v. SYAR INDUSTRIES, INC., Civil No. C 14-00779 JD NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT AND REQUEST TO VACATE STATUS CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER 17 18 Defendant. Honorable James Donato 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Notice of Settlement and Request to Vacate CMC Civil No. C 14-00779-JD 1 TO THE COURT AND TO THE PARTIES: 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff San Francisco Baykeeper (“Baykeeper”) and 3 Defendant Syar Indusries, Inc. (“Syar”) (collectively, the “Parties”) have reached a tentative settlement 4 in this action, which has been executed by the Parties. As required by federal law, a copy of the 5 [Proposed] Consent Decree has been sent to the U.S. Department of Justice and to the U.S. 6 Environmental Protection Agency (collectively, “the Agencies”) for a mandatory 45-day review 7 period under 33 U.S.C. § 1365(c)(3) and 40 C.F.R. § 135.5. Copies of the [Proposed] Consent Decree 8 will be sent to the Agencies via U.S. Certified Mail on today’s date. Upon expiration of the 45-day 9 review period, the Parties will jointly request that the Court (1) approve and execute an Order 10 dismissing the Complaint, and (2) approve and execute the [Proposed] Consent Decree which provides 11 for continuing Court jurisdiction over any disputes which may arise between the parties under the 12 agreement. 13 In light of the 45-day statutory review period, which ends on December 18, 2014, Plaintiff 14 respectfully requests that the Court vacate from its calendar the November 19, 2014 Case Management 15 Conference and associated deadlines, and issue an order that the Parties have until December 23, 2014 16 to file a motion to enter the [Proposed] Consent Decree. 17 18 WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests the Court to approve and enter the Proposed Order below. 19 20 Dated: November 3, 2014 21 Respectfully submitted, By: 22 23 /s/ George Torgun George Torgun Attorney for Plaintiff SAN FRANCISCO BAYKEEPER 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Notice of Settlement and Request to Vacate CMC Civil No. C 14-00779-JD [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Case Management Conference set for November 19, 2014 3 and all associated deadlines are vacated. The Court sets December 23, 2014 as the deadline for the 4 Parties to file a motion to enter the [Proposed] Consent Decree. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. S NO 11 ____________________________________ Honorable James Donatoto na mes Do UniteduStatesaDistrict Judge J d ge J RT 12 R NIA 10 ERED O ORD IT IS S FO 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA H ER LI Date: ______________ 11/6/14 UNIT ED 8 RT U O 7 S DISTRICT TE C TA 13 14 A 6 N D IS T IC T R OF 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Notice of Settlement and Request to Vacate CMC Civil No. C 14-00779-JD C

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?