Healy v. Fortis Benefits Insurance Company et al
Filing
59
STIPULATION AND ORDER Re: Continuance of Motion for Attorneys' Fees. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/22/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2015)
1
2
3
4
Rebecca Grey (State Bar No. 194940)
Email: grey@greylaw-sf.com
THE GREY LAW FIRM, P.C.
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1101
San Francisco, California 94104
Telephone: (415) 262-9926
Facsimile: (415) 262-9981
5
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
LIZABETH HEALY
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
Horace W. Green (State Bar No. 115699)
Email: hgreen@bpbsllp.com
BUCHMAN PROVINE BROTHERS SMITH LLP
2033 N. Main Street, Suite 720
Walnut Creek, California 94596
Telephone: (925) 944-9700
Facsimile: (925) 944-9701
Attorneys for Defendants
UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY (formerly known as FORTIS BENEFITS
INSURANCE COMPANY); ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS; and LIGHTHOUSE CAPITAL
PARTNERS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
SAN FRANCISCO
18
19
20
LIZABETH HEALY, an individual,
Plaintiff,
21
22
23
24
25
26
vs.
FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY,
UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY,
ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS,
ASSURANT, INC., LIGHTHOUSE CAPITAL
PARTNERS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY
INSURANCE PLAN, LIGHTHOUSE CAPITAL
PARTNERS, INC.,
27
28
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 3:14-cv-00832-RS
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF
MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES,
LITIGATION EXPENSES AND
PREJUDGMENT/POSTJUDGMENT
INTEREST
Judge: Honorable Richard Seeborg
-1STIPULATION RE: CONTINUANCE OF MOTION FOR
ATTORNEYS’ FEES, EXPENSES AND INTEREST
Case No. 3:14-cv-00832-RS
1
Plaintiff Lizabeth Healy and Defendants Fortis Benefits Insurance Company, Union Security
2
Insurance Company, Assurant Employee Benefits, and Lighthouse Capital Partners, Inc. Long Term
3
Disability Plan (together, the Parties), through their respective attorneys, stipulate as follows:
4
The Parties began the Meet and Confer process on October 19, 2015 when Plaintiff’s counsel
5
contacted Defendants’ counsel to initiate the process. Plaintiff’s counsel and Defendants’ counsel are
6
working through scheduling conflicts that have delayed the meet and confer process. In order to
7
facilitate a meaningful meet and confer, the Parties agreed to a continuation of the filing date of
8
Plaintiff’s Motion for fees, expenses and interest.
9
For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties hereto
10
through their respective attorneys of record that the currently scheduled October 22, 2015 date for
11
filing Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Expenses and Interest be continued to November 5, 2015.
12
The Parties respectfully request that this Court permit a continuance of the applicable deadline.
13
14
Dated: October 21, 2015
THE GREY LAW FIRM, P.C.
15
By:
16
17
/s/ Rebecca Grey
Rebecca Grey
Attorney for Plaintiff
LIZABETH HEALY
18
19
Dated: October 21, 2015
BUCHMAN PROVINE BROTHERS SMITH LLP
20
21
22
23
24
25
By:
/s/ Horace W. Green
Horace W. Green
Attorneys for Defendants
UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY
(formerly known as FORTIS BENEFITS
INSURANCE COMPANY); ASSURANT
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS; and LIGHTHOUSE
CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. LONG TERM
DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION RE: CONTINUANCE OF MOTION FOR
ATTORNEYS’ FEES, EXPENSES AND INTEREST
Case No. 3:14-cv-00832-RS
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
3
Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: 10/22/15
6
By:
7
Honorable Richard Seeborg
U.S. District Court Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION RE: CONTINUANCE OF MOTION FOR
ATTORNEYS’ FEES, EXPENSES AND INTEREST
Case No. 3:14-cv-00832-RS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?