Healy v. Fortis Benefits Insurance Company et al

Filing 59

STIPULATION AND ORDER Re: Continuance of Motion for Attorneys' Fees. Signed by Judge Richard Seeborg on 10/22/15. (cl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/22/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Rebecca Grey (State Bar No. 194940) Email: grey@greylaw-sf.com THE GREY LAW FIRM, P.C. 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1101 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: (415) 262-9926 Facsimile: (415) 262-9981 5 6 Attorneys for Plaintiff LIZABETH HEALY 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Horace W. Green (State Bar No. 115699) Email: hgreen@bpbsllp.com BUCHMAN PROVINE BROTHERS SMITH LLP 2033 N. Main Street, Suite 720 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Telephone: (925) 944-9700 Facsimile: (925) 944-9701 Attorneys for Defendants UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY (formerly known as FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY); ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS; and LIGHTHOUSE CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 SAN FRANCISCO 18 19 20 LIZABETH HEALY, an individual, Plaintiff, 21 22 23 24 25 26 vs. FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY, UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY, ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS, ASSURANT, INC., LIGHTHOUSE CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN, LIGHTHOUSE CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC., 27 28 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:14-cv-00832-RS STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, LITIGATION EXPENSES AND PREJUDGMENT/POSTJUDGMENT INTEREST Judge: Honorable Richard Seeborg -1STIPULATION RE: CONTINUANCE OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, EXPENSES AND INTEREST Case No. 3:14-cv-00832-RS 1 Plaintiff Lizabeth Healy and Defendants Fortis Benefits Insurance Company, Union Security 2 Insurance Company, Assurant Employee Benefits, and Lighthouse Capital Partners, Inc. Long Term 3 Disability Plan (together, the Parties), through their respective attorneys, stipulate as follows: 4 The Parties began the Meet and Confer process on October 19, 2015 when Plaintiff’s counsel 5 contacted Defendants’ counsel to initiate the process. Plaintiff’s counsel and Defendants’ counsel are 6 working through scheduling conflicts that have delayed the meet and confer process. In order to 7 facilitate a meaningful meet and confer, the Parties agreed to a continuation of the filing date of 8 Plaintiff’s Motion for fees, expenses and interest. 9 For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties hereto 10 through their respective attorneys of record that the currently scheduled October 22, 2015 date for 11 filing Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Expenses and Interest be continued to November 5, 2015. 12 The Parties respectfully request that this Court permit a continuance of the applicable deadline. 13 14 Dated: October 21, 2015 THE GREY LAW FIRM, P.C. 15 By: 16 17 /s/ Rebecca Grey Rebecca Grey Attorney for Plaintiff LIZABETH HEALY 18 19 Dated: October 21, 2015 BUCHMAN PROVINE BROTHERS SMITH LLP 20 21 22 23 24 25 By: /s/ Horace W. Green Horace W. Green Attorneys for Defendants UNION SECURITY INSURANCE COMPANY (formerly known as FORTIS BENEFITS INSURANCE COMPANY); ASSURANT EMPLOYEE BENEFITS; and LIGHTHOUSE CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC. LONG TERM DISABILITY INSURANCE PLAN 26 27 28 -2STIPULATION RE: CONTINUANCE OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, EXPENSES AND INTEREST Case No. 3:14-cv-00832-RS 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER 2 3 Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 5 Dated: 10/22/15 6 By: 7 Honorable Richard Seeborg U.S. District Court Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3STIPULATION RE: CONTINUANCE OF MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES, EXPENSES AND INTEREST Case No. 3:14-cv-00832-RS

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?