Patel v. Nike Retail Services, Inc. et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 18 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DATES filed by Nike Retail Services, Inc. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on May 20, 2014. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 BLUMENTHAL, NORDREHAUG & BHOWMIK Norman B. Blumental Kyle R. Nordrehaug Aparajit Bhowmik 2255 Calle Clara La Jolla, California 92037 Telephone: (858) 551-1223 Facsimile: (858) 551-1232 5 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP Jon D. Meer (SBN 144389) jmeer@seyfarth.com Sheryl L. Skibbe (SBN 199441) sskibbe@seyfarth.com Casey J.T. McCoy (SBN 229106) cjtmccoy@seyfarth.com 2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500 Los Angeles, California 90067-3021 Telephone: (310) 277-7200 Facsimile: (310) 201-5219 Attorneys for Defendant NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC. 14 15 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 20 PAYAL PATEL, an individual, on behalf of herself, on behalf of all persons similarly situated, and as the representative of the State of California, 21 Plaintiff, 22 v. Case No. 3:14-cv-00851 Judge: Hon. Jon S. Tigar STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES 23 24 NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC., a Corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 25 Defendants. Complaint Filed: November 25, 2013 Complaint Served: February 7, 2014 Case Removed: February 26, 2014 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES 1 STIPULATION 2 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b), Defendant NIKE Retail Services, Inc. 3 (“Defendant”) and Plaintiff Payal Patel (“Plaintiff”) (collectively, the “Parties”), acting by and 4 through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and request that the Court continue the current 5 Case Management Conference and related deadlines for the Parties to conduct their initial Rule 6 26(f) conference, exchange initial disclosures, and to file a Joint Case Management Statement 7 pursuant to Local Rule 16-9. This stipulation is based on the following facts: 8 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand was heard on May 8, 2014; 9 WHEREAS, Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand was taken under submission and no ruling has 10 11 12 13 14 been issued by this Court; WHEREAS, the deadline for the parties to meet and confer pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f) was May 14, 2014; WHEREAS, the Parties are to file their Joint Case Management Statement and exchange initial disclosures by tomorrow, May 20, 2014; 15 WHEREAS, the Case Management Conference is scheduled for June 4, 2014; 16 WHEREAS, the Parties agree that the pending Motion to Remand should be resolved 17 before the Parties and the Court expend time and resources on conferences, reports and 18 disclosures; 19 WHEREAS, the Parties’ jointly request that the Court continue the current Case 20 Management Conference and related deadlines to a date after the Court rules on Plaintiff’s 21 Motion to Remand; 22 WHEREAS, no prior extension of time has been requested by the Parties; 23 THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and request the Court to continue the Case 24 Management Conference, currently schedule for June 4, 2014, to a date at least three (3) weeks 25 after the Court rules on Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. 26 The Parties further stipulate and propose to continue the related deadlines as follows: 27 28 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES 1  the Court issues its order on Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand; 2 3 The Parties shall engage in the Initial Rule 26(f) Conference seven (7) days after  The Parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement pursuant to Local Rule 4 16-9 fourteen (14) days after the Court issues its order on Plaintiff’s Motion to 5 Remand; 6 7 8 9  The Parties shall exchange initial disclosures fourteen (14) days after the Court issues its order on Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand; IT IS SO STIPULATED. DATED: May 19, 2014 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 10 11 By: /s/ Casey J.T. McCoy Jon D. Meer Sheryl L. Skibbe Casey J.T. McCoy Attorneys for Defendant NIKE RETAIL SERVICES, INC. 12 13 14 15 DATED: May 19, 2014 BLUMENTHAL, NORDREHAUG & BHOWMIK 16 17 18 19 By: /s/ Aparajit Bhowmik Norman B. Blumenthal Kyle R. Nordrehaug Aparajit Bhowmik Attorneys for Plaintiff PAYAL PATEL 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES 1 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER Good cause appearing and pursuant to the Parties’ above stipulation, the Court GRANTS 3 the parties’ request to continue the current Case Management Conference and related deadlines 4 for the Parties to conduct their initial Rule 26(f) conference, exchange initial disclosures, and to 5 file a Joint Case Management Statement pursuant to Local Rule 16-9, as follows: 6  the Court issues its order on Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand; 7 8  Remand; 10  14 The Parties shall exchange initial disclosures fourteen (14) days after the Court issues its order on Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand; 12 13 The Parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement pursuant to Local Rule 16-9 fourteen (14) days after the Court issues its order on Plaintiff’s Motion to 9 11 The Parties shall engage in the Initial Rule 26(f) Conference seven (7) days after  The Case Management Conference is continued to a date at least three (3) weeks after the Court rules on Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand. 15 If the Court denies the motion to remand, the parties shall, within three days of that order, 16 jointly move the court to set a specific case management conference date and related deadlines 17 25 ER R NIA n S. T J u d ge J o H 24 RT 23 DIF AS MO NO 22 _______________________________ Honorable Jon RDERED S. Tigar United States District D IS SO O IE Judge IT i ga r LI 21 Dated: May 20, 2014 A 20 FO 19 ISTRIC ES D TC T TA RT U O S IT IS SO ORDERED. UNIT ED 18 N F D IS T IC T O R C 26 27 28 3 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE THE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND RELATED DEADLINES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?