The Regents of the University of California v. The Corporate Executive Board Company

Filing 24

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 21 Stipulation selecting Private ADR.(knmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/25/2014)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

The Regents of the University of
California
,
Plaintiff,
v.
The Corporate Executive Board
Company
,
Defendant.

CASE NO. 3:14-cv-00885-VC

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
AS MODIFIED

Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
☐
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
☐
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
X
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
X
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) The parties agree to mediate
the dispute before a private neutral. The parties shall work with one another in
good faith to select an appropriate mediator.
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
X
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered.)
☐

other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated: August 19, 2014

/s/ Raffi V. Zerounian
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: August 19, 2014

/s/ Allison W. Buchner
Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER
The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________________
ERED

NO
RT

ince
J u d ge V

ia

A

H

ER

Chhabr

R NIA

RD
IS SO O FIED
IT
DI
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
AS MO

FO

August 25, 2014

UNIT
ED

Dated:

S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA

RT
U
O

S

☐

LI

xx
☐

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11

ATTESTATION OF CONCURRENCE IN FILING
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filer hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of
this document has been obtained from Raffi V. Zerounian which shall serve in lieu of his
signature on the document.
Dated: August 19th, 2014

Respectfully submitted:
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
Dale M. Cendali
Claudia Ray
Allison W. Buchner

By: /s/ Allison W. Buchner
Attorneys for Defendant
The Corporate Executive Board Company