The Regents of the University of California v. The Corporate Executive Board Company

Filing 35

Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 33 Stipulation to Extend Time to Reopen the Case.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 RAFFI V. ZEROUNIAN (SBN 236388) rzerounian@hansonbridgett.com HANSON BRIDGETT, LLP 425 Market St. 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 995-5044 Facsimile: (415) 541-9366 Attorneys for Plaintiff The Regents of the University of California 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY Case No.: 3:14-cv-00885-VC OF CALIFORNIA, a California corporation, ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION Plaintiff, OF TIME TO REINSTATE THE vs. CASE THE CORPORATE EXECUTIVE BOARD COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, and DOES 1-10, The Honorable Vince Chhabria Complaint Filed: February 27, 2014 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION Case No. 3:14-cv-00885-VC 11100887.1 1 2 3 4 ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, the Court orders as follows: The Parties retain the right to reopen this action until May 18, 2015 if the 5 settlement is not consummated in a long-form settlement agreement. If a request to 6 reopen is not filed and served on opposing counsel by May 1, 2015, the dismissal 7 previously entered on February 18, 2015 will be with prejudice. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. 10 11 DATED: April 15 ____________, 2015 12 The Honorable Vince Chhabria 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION Case No. 3:14-cv-00885-VC 11100887.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?