The Regents of the University of California v. The Corporate Executive Board Company
Filing
35
Order by Hon. Vince Chhabria granting 33 Stipulation to Extend Time to Reopen the Case.(knm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2015)
1
2
3
4
5
6
RAFFI V. ZEROUNIAN (SBN 236388)
rzerounian@hansonbridgett.com
HANSON BRIDGETT, LLP
425 Market St. 26th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Telephone: (415) 995-5044
Facsimile: (415) 541-9366
Attorneys for Plaintiff
The Regents of the University of California
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY Case No.: 3:14-cv-00885-VC
OF CALIFORNIA, a California
corporation,
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION
Plaintiff,
OF TIME TO REINSTATE THE
vs.
CASE
THE CORPORATE EXECUTIVE
BOARD COMPANY, a Delaware
corporation, and DOES 1-10,
The Honorable Vince Chhabria
Complaint Filed: February 27, 2014
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION
Case No. 3:14-cv-00885-VC
11100887.1
1
2
3
4
ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and for good cause shown, the Court
orders as follows:
The Parties retain the right to reopen this action until May 18, 2015 if the
5
settlement is not consummated in a long-form settlement agreement. If a request to
6
reopen is not filed and served on opposing counsel by May 1, 2015, the dismissal
7
previously entered on February 18, 2015 will be with prejudice.
8
9
IT IS SO ORDERED.
10
11
DATED: April 15
____________, 2015
12
The Honorable Vince Chhabria
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION
Case No. 3:14-cv-00885-VC
11100887.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?