Kimmons v. Avilar et al
Filing
21
ORDER by Judge James Donato denying 19 Motion for Default Judgment; granting 20 Stipulation for extension of time. (lrcS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2014)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
BRANLETT EUGENE KIMMONS,
Case No. 14-cv-00954-JD
8
Plaintiff,
9
ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION
10
v.
11
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Re: Dkt. Nos. 19, 20
12
A. AVILAR,
13
14
Defendant.
15
16
GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ordered that Defendant’s request for an
17
extension of time (Docket No. 20) is GRANTED. Defendant has until October 30, 2014, to file a
18
dispositive motion. Plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment (Docket No. 19) is DENIED as
19
Defendant has appeared in this action.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: October 3, 2014
______________________________________
JAMES DONATO
United States District Judge
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
BRANLETT EUGENE KIMMONS,
Case No. 14-cv-00954-JD
Plaintiff,
8
v.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
9
10
A. AVILAR,
Defendant.
United States District Court
Northern District of California
11
12
13
14
15
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S.
District Court, Northern District of California.
That on 10/3/2014, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle
located in the Clerk's office.
16
17
18
19
Branlett Eugene Kimmons ID: AR2030
2900 Bristol Street
Suite B-300
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
20
21
Dated: 10/3/2014
22
23
Richard W. Wieking
Clerk, United States District Court
24
25
26
27
By:________________________
LISA R. CLARK, Deputy Clerk to the
Honorable JAMES DONATO
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?