BrightEdge Technologies, Inc. v. Searchmetrics, GmbH. et al

Filing 87

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF re 83 MOTION to Continue Hearing Date. Motion Hearing re: 80 Motion to Stay continued to 11/12/2014 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. William H. Orrick. Signed by Judge William H. Orrick on 10/14/2014. (jmdS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BRIGHTEDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Case No. 14-cv-01009-WHO Plaintiff, 8 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF 9 10 SEARCHMETRICS, GMBH., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 80 Defendants. United States District Court Northern District of California 11 12 There are two motions currently set for hearing in this case: defendants’ Motion for Stay 13 of the Case Pending Inter Partes Review, set for hearing on November 5, 2014; and plaintiff’s 14 Motion for Leave to File a Third Amended Complaint, set for hearing on November 12, 2014. 15 Dkt. Nos. 70, 80. On October 10, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for administrative relief under 16 Civil Local Rule 7-11, requesting that the hearing on defendants’ motion be pushed back one 17 week, to November 12, 2014, so that both motions could be heard on the same date. Dkt. No. 83. 18 Defendants filed an opposition on October 14, 2014. Dkt. No. 85. 19 Plaintiff’s motion for administrative relief is GRANTED. The hearing on defendants’ 20 Motion for Stay of the Case Pending Inter Partes Review is moved to November 12, 2014 at 2:00 21 pm. The briefing schedule for that motion, as well as for plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to File a 22 Third Amended Complaint, remains unchanged. 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 14, 2014 ______________________________________ WILLIAM H. ORRICK United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?