Hayes v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corp. et al

Filing 158

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: UNTIMELY FILING OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS. Show Cause Response due by 11/17/2015. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on November 10, 2015. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2015)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KEITH THOMAS, et al., Case No. 14-cv-01160-JST Plaintiffs, 8 v. 9 10 MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR CORP., et al., United States District Court Northern District of California 13 14 Re: ECF No. 155 Defendants. 11 12 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: UNTIMELY FILING OF DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS Before the Court is Defendant Margaret Sakai’s Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Complaint. ECF No. 155. The motion was filed on November 9, 2015. In its May 5, 2015 Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Order Enlarging Time, the 15 Court continued the deadline to respond to the operative complaint until after the Court resolved a 16 then-pending motion to consolidate cases. ECF No. 85. The May 5 order specified that if the 17 Court granted the motion to consolidate, the Plaintiffs would have fourteen days to file an 18 amended or consolidated complaint, and the Defendants would then have thirty days to answer or 19 otherwise respond. Id. at 2. The Court granted the motion to consolidate on June 15, 2015, ECF 20 No. 112, and the Plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Complaint on June 26, 2015, ECF No. 114. 21 Accordingly, the deadline for Defendants to file their motions to dismiss was July 27, 2015. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Court hereby orders Ms. Sakai to show cause why her Motion to Dismiss should not be stricken due to untimely filing. Ms. Sakai shall file her response to this order within seven days of its issuance. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 10, 2015 ______________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?