Hayes v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corp. et al

Filing 180

ORDER VACATING HEARING re 176 MOTION for Discovery PLAINTIFFS NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION: (1) TO AUTHORIZE SERVICE ON UNSERVED DEFENDANTS LOCATED ABROAD PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 4(f)(3) filed by Oklahoma Police Pension & Retirement System, Keith Thomas, Herb Smith, Richard Hayes. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on January 20, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/19/2016)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 RICHARD HAYES, et al., Case No. 14-cv-01160-JST Plaintiffs, 5 ORDER VACATING HEARING v. 6 7 8 MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR CORP., et al., Re: ECF No. 176 Defendants. Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Authorize Service or in the Alternative, to 10 Partially Lift the PSLRA Discovery Stay. ECF No. 176. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 11 United States District Court Northern District of California 9 Procedure 78(b) and Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds the matter suitable for disposition 12 without oral argument. The hearing on this matter, currently scheduled for January 28, 2016, is 13 hereby VACATED. 14 If, however, any party advises the Court in writing by no later than two days from the date 15 of this Order that most or all of the argument for its side will be conducted by a lawyer who has 16 been licensed to practice law for five or fewer years, and who has not previously presented 17 argument before this Court, then the Court will reschedule the hearing at a time that is convenient 18 to all parties in order to provide that opportunity. Counsel shall confer with each other, and the 19 party requesting the rescheduling of the hearing shall identify the upcoming available dates on the 20 Court’s calendar at which all counsel are available for the hearing. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: January 19, 2016 _____________________________________ JON S. TIGAR United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?