Hayes v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corp. et al

Filing 217

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 203 STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Selecting Private ADR by Avenue Capital Management II, L.P., Michael Elkins, Randal Klein filed by Avenue Capital Management II, L.P., Randal Klein, Michael Elkins. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on April 11, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/11/2016)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA KEITH THOMAS, et al. , Plaintiff(s), v. MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR CORP. , Defendant(s). _______________________________/ CASE NO. ______________________ 3:14-cv-01160-JST STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5: The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process: Court Processes: 9 Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4) 9 Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5) 9 Mediation (ADR L.R. 6) (Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5) Private Process: Mediation before Hon. ✔ 9 Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________ Layne Phillips _____________________________________________________________________________ The parties agree to hold the ADR session by: 9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. ) ✔ 9 July 12, 2016 other requested deadline _____________________________________________ Dated:___________ 4/5/16 ____________________________ /s/ Joshua B. Silverman Attorney for Plaintiff Dated:____________ 4/5/16 ____________________________ /s/ John C. Murphy Attorney for Defendant CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE [PROPOSED] ORDER X 9 9 The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED. The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 11, 2016 __________________________________ DISTRICT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.” Rev. 12/11 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?