Hayes v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corp. et al
Filing
243
STIPULATION AND ORDER re 240 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION filed by Avenue Capital Management II, L.P. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 11, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2016)
1
2
3
4
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP
PETER I. ALTMAN (SBN 285292)
2029 Century Park East, Suite 2400
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3010
Telephone: (310) 782-3085
Facsimile: (310) 229-1001
Email: paltman@akingump.com
5
6
7
Attorneys for Defendant Avenue Capital
Management II, L.P.
[Additional Counsel on Signature Page]
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
KEITH THOMAS, RICHARD HAYES, HERB
SMITH, and OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION &
RETIREMENT SYSTEM,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
16
17
18
19
20
STIPULATION REGARDING
MOTION FOR CLASS
CERTIFICATION
v.
14
15
CASE NO.: 3:14-cv-01160-JST
MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR CORP. SANG
PARK, TAE YOUNG HWANG, MARGARET
SAKAI, R. DOUGLAS NORBY, ILBOK LEE,
NADER TAVAKOLI, RANDAL KLEIN,
MICHAEL ELKINS, AVENUE CAPITAL
MANAGEMENT II, L.P., BARCLAYS CAPITAL
INC., DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC.,
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., UBS
SECURITIES LLC and NEEDHAM & COMPANY,
LLC,
Defendants.
21
WHEREAS, on July 8, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Class Certification,
22
23
ECF No. 231 (“Motion”);
WHEREAS, Avenue Capital Management II, L.P.’s (“Avenue”) opposition
24
25
(“Opposition”) to the Motion is due on October 14, 2016;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ reply to the Opposition (“Reply”) is due on December 2,
26
27
2016;
28
STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER ON CONFIDENTIALITY
3:14-cv-01160-JST
WHEREAS, Avenue requests to increase its page limit for the Opposition from
1
2
25 pages to 35 pages;
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs request to increase their page limit for the Reply from 15
3
4
pages to 25 pages;
5
6
7
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, SUBJECT TO COURT APPROVAL,
THAT:
1. Avenue’s Opposition shall not exceed 35 pages, exclusive of cover sheet, tables of
contents and authorities, and appendices; and
8
9
2. Plaintiffs’ Reply shall not exceed 25 pages, exclusive of cover sheet, tables of contents
and authorities, and appendices.
10
11
12
13
Dated: October 7, 2016
POMERANTZ LLP
AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD
LLP
/s/ Joshua B. Silverman
Patrick V. Dahlstrom
Joshua B. Silverman
10 South LaSalle Street, Suite 3505
Chicago, IL 60603
Telephone: (312) 377-1181
Facsimile: (312) 377-1184
pdahlstrom@pomlaw.com
jbsilverman@pomlaw.com
/s/ John C. Murphy
John C. Murphy
Sydney Spector
One Bryant Park
New York, NY 10036
Telephone: (212) 872-1000
Fax: (212) 872-1002
jmurphy@akingump.com
sspector@akingump.com
-and-
-and-
Marc I. Gross
Jeremy A. Lieberman
Michael J. Wernke
600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor
New York, NY 10016
Telephone: (212) 661-1100
Facsimile: (212) 661-8665
migross@pomlaw.com
jalieberman@pomlaw.com
mjwernke@pomlaw.com
Neal R. Marder
Peter I. Altman
2029 Century Park East, Suite 2400
Los Angeles, CA 90067-3010
Telephone: (310) 782-3085
Facsimile: (310) 229-1001
nmarder@akingump.com
paltman@akingump.com
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Attorneys for Defendant Avenue Capital
Management II, L.P.
Lead Counsel for the Class
STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER ON CONFIDENTIALITY
-23:14-cv-01160-JST
1
2
3
4
CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE FROM OTHER PARTIES
I, John C. Murphy, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this
5
STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION. In compliance with
6
Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatory has concurred in this filing.
7
/s/ John C. Murphy
John C. Murphy
8
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
Dated: ____________________________
October 11, 2016
___________________________________
Honorable Jon S. Tigar
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER ON CONFIDENTIALITY
-33:14-cv-01160-JST
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?