Hayes v. Magnachip Semiconductor Corp. et al

Filing 243

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 240 STIPULATION WITH PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION filed by Avenue Capital Management II, L.P. Signed by Judge Jon S. Tigar on October 11, 2016. (wsn, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/11/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP PETER I. ALTMAN (SBN 285292) 2029 Century Park East, Suite 2400 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3010 Telephone: (310) 782-3085 Facsimile: (310) 229-1001 Email: paltman@akingump.com 5 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant Avenue Capital Management II, L.P. [Additional Counsel on Signature Page] 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 KEITH THOMAS, RICHARD HAYES, HERB SMITH, and OKLAHOMA POLICE PENSION & RETIREMENT SYSTEM, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 16 17 18 19 20 STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION v. 14 15 CASE NO.: 3:14-cv-01160-JST MAGNACHIP SEMICONDUCTOR CORP. SANG PARK, TAE YOUNG HWANG, MARGARET SAKAI, R. DOUGLAS NORBY, ILBOK LEE, NADER TAVAKOLI, RANDAL KLEIN, MICHAEL ELKINS, AVENUE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT II, L.P., BARCLAYS CAPITAL INC., DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES INC., CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS INC., UBS SECURITIES LLC and NEEDHAM & COMPANY, LLC, Defendants. 21 WHEREAS, on July 8, 2016, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Class Certification, 22 23 ECF No. 231 (“Motion”); WHEREAS, Avenue Capital Management II, L.P.’s (“Avenue”) opposition 24 25 (“Opposition”) to the Motion is due on October 14, 2016; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ reply to the Opposition (“Reply”) is due on December 2, 26 27 2016; 28 STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER ON CONFIDENTIALITY 3:14-cv-01160-JST WHEREAS, Avenue requests to increase its page limit for the Opposition from 1 2 25 pages to 35 pages; WHEREAS, Plaintiffs request to increase their page limit for the Reply from 15 3 4 pages to 25 pages; 5 6 7 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, SUBJECT TO COURT APPROVAL, THAT: 1. Avenue’s Opposition shall not exceed 35 pages, exclusive of cover sheet, tables of contents and authorities, and appendices; and 8 9 2. Plaintiffs’ Reply shall not exceed 25 pages, exclusive of cover sheet, tables of contents and authorities, and appendices. 10 11 12 13 Dated: October 7, 2016 POMERANTZ LLP AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP /s/ Joshua B. Silverman Patrick V. Dahlstrom Joshua B. Silverman 10 South LaSalle Street, Suite 3505 Chicago, IL 60603 Telephone: (312) 377-1181 Facsimile: (312) 377-1184 pdahlstrom@pomlaw.com jbsilverman@pomlaw.com /s/ John C. Murphy John C. Murphy Sydney Spector One Bryant Park New York, NY 10036 Telephone: (212) 872-1000 Fax: (212) 872-1002 jmurphy@akingump.com sspector@akingump.com -and- -and- Marc I. Gross Jeremy A. Lieberman Michael J. Wernke 600 Third Avenue, 20th Floor New York, NY 10016 Telephone: (212) 661-1100 Facsimile: (212) 661-8665 migross@pomlaw.com jalieberman@pomlaw.com mjwernke@pomlaw.com Neal R. Marder Peter I. Altman 2029 Century Park East, Suite 2400 Los Angeles, CA 90067-3010 Telephone: (310) 782-3085 Facsimile: (310) 229-1001 nmarder@akingump.com paltman@akingump.com 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Attorneys for Defendant Avenue Capital Management II, L.P. Lead Counsel for the Class STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER ON CONFIDENTIALITY -23:14-cv-01160-JST 1 2 3 4 CERTIFICATION OF CONCURRENCE FROM OTHER PARTIES I, John C. Murphy, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this 5 STIPULATION REGARDING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION. In compliance with 6 Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that the other signatory has concurred in this filing. 7 /s/ John C. Murphy John C. Murphy 8 9 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 Dated: ____________________________ October 11, 2016 ___________________________________ Honorable Jon S. Tigar United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION REGARDING PROTECTIVE ORDER ON CONFIDENTIALITY -33:14-cv-01160-JST

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?