Dear v. Equifax Information Services LLC
Filing
7
Corrected Initial Case Management Scheduling Order (dtmS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/17/2014)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BRIAN R. DEAR,
No. C 14-01209 NC
Plaintiff (s),
v.
EQUIF AX INFORMATION SERVICES
LLC,
Defendant(s).
ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
AND ADR DEADLINES
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Honorable Nathanael Cousins.
When serving the complaint or notice of removal, the plaintiff or removing defendant must serve on all
other parties a copy of this order , the Notice of Assignment of Case to a United States
Magistrate Judge for Trial, and all other documents specified in Civil Local Rule 4-2. Counsel must
comply with the case schedule listed below unless the Court otherwise orders.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Alternative Dispute Resolution
(ADR) Multi-Option Program governed by ADR Local Rule 3. Counsel and clients shall familiarize
themselves with that rule and with the material entitled "Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern
District of California" on the Court ADR Internet site at cand.uscourts.gov/adr. A limited number of
printed copies are available from the Clerk's Office for parties in cases not subject to the court's
Electronic Case Filing program (ECF).
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff or removing defendant serve upon all parties
the brochure entitled "Consenting To A Magistrate Judge's Jurisdiction In The Northern
District Of California," additional copies of which can be downloaded from the following
Internet site: http://www.cand.uscourts.gov.
CASE SCHEDULE -ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM
Date
Event
3/14/2014
Complaint filed
5/21/2014
*Last day to:
• meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early
settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan
Governing Rule
FRCivP 26
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?