Indura Systems, Inc. v. Seoane

Filing 42

STIPULATED INJUNCTION AND JUDGMENT BY STIPULATION The parties stipulate to permanent injunctive relief in favor of Indura as set forth in the injunction. The terms of the parties' settlement agreement are incorporated and the stipulated injunction does not alter or supersede the obligations of any parties to that settlement agreement. Pursuant to stipulation, it is so ordered. Signed by Judge Maxine M. Chesney on March 31, 2015. (mmclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/31/2015)

Case3:14-cv-01255-MMC Document41 Filed03/25/15 Page1 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

PERKINS COIE LLP
BRIAN P. HENNESSY (No. 226721)
[e-mail]
J. PATRICK CORRIGAN (No. 240859)
[e-mail]
BROCK S. WEBER (No. 261383)
[e-mail]
3150 Porter Drive
Palo Alto, CA 94304-1212
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650.838.4350
Attorneys for Plaintiff
INDURA SYSTEMS, INC.

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

INDURA SYSTEMS, INC.,

12

Case No. 3:14-CV-01255-MMC
STIPULATED INJUNCTION AND

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

Isaac SEOANE,

15

JUDGMENT BY STIPULATION

Defendant.

16
17

Plaintiff Indura Systems, Inc. (“Indura”) and Defendant Isaac Seoane (“Seoane”) stipulate

18

to permanent injunctive relief in favor of Indura as set forth below. This Stipulated Injunction

19

arises out of a settlement agreement entered into by the parties (the “Settlement Agreement”).

20

The terms of the Settlement Agreement are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.

21

This Stipulated Injunction does not alter or supersede the obligations of any parties to that

22

Settlement Agreement.

23

Indura and Seoane hereby stipulates as follows:

24

1.

Seoane consents to this Court’s jurisdiction over the subject matter at issue in this

2.

Seoane consents to this Court’s personal jurisdiction over him for the purposes of

25
26

action.

27

entry and enforcement of this Stipulated Injunction and enforcement of the Settlement

28

Agreement.
-1-

STIPULATED INJUNCTION
Case No. 3:14-CV-01255-MMC

Case3:14-cv-01255-MMC Document41 Filed03/25/15 Page2 of 4

Case3:14-cv-01255-MMC Document41 Filed03/25/15 Page3 of 4

1
2

JUDGMENT BY STIPULATION
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4

DATED: March __, 2015
31

5
6

HONORABLE MAXINE M. CHESNEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-

STIPULATED INJUNCTION
Case No. 3:14-CV-01255-MMC