LocusPoint Networks, LLC v. D.T.V. LLC

Filing 129

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF LOCUSPOINT NETWORKS MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT RE THIRD-PARTY APPOINTMENT. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on 1/8/2016. (ahm, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/8/2016)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 B. ANDREW BEDNARK (admitted pro hac vice)   abednark@comm.com MARK E. BERGHAUSEN (S.B. #278968) mberghausen@comm.com O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP Times Square Tower 7 Times Square New York, New York 10036-6524 Telephone: (212) 326-2000 Facsimile: (212) 326-2061 Mark Schallert (S.B #112542) Law Office of Mark Schallert mark@schallertlaw.com 310 29th Avenue San Francisco, CA 94121 Telephone: (415) 994-6537 Facsimile: (559) 241-7256 Attorneys for Plaintiff LocusPoint Networks, LLC UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION LOCUSPOINT NETWORKS, LLC, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) D.T.V., LLC, A WYOMING Limited Liability ) ) Company, ) Defendant. ) ) ) ) Case No.: 3:14-cv-01278-JSC [PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFF LOCUSPOINT NETWORK’S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT RE THIRD-PARTY APPOINTMENT Judge: Hon. Jacqueline Scott Corley Place: Courtroom F, 15th Floor 26 The Motion of Plaintiff LocusPoint Networks, LLC (“LPN”) to enforce its settlement 27 agreement came on for hearing on January 7, 2016. This Court has jurisdiction to enforce the 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFF LOCUSPOINT NETWORK’S MOTION TO ENFORCEMENT SETTLEMENT 1 parties’ settlement agreement per the Stipulation and Order Re Dismissal of Case and 2 Jurisdiction Over Settlement entered on September 16, 2015. 3 The settlement agreement requires the parties “to appoint a neutral third party to ensure 4 that WPHA enters and continues to participate in the Auction until its bid is accepted by the 5 FCC.” This settlement agreement required appointment of the neutral third party by December 6 12, 2015, but the parties were unable to agree on the appointment. LPN’s Motion sought, inter 7 alia, to compel appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers Advisory Services (“PwC”) to serve as 8 the neutral third party. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 The Court, having considered the parties’ submissions and argument of counsel and files in this matter, and GOOD CAUSE appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. DTV shall execute the document entitled “Appointment of Neutral Third Party As Required Under Settlement Agreement,” a copy of which is attached hereto, thereby appointing PwC to serve as the neutral third party. 17 18 19 8 Date: January ___, 2016 _________________________________ Jacqueline Scott Corley United States Magistrate Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFF LOCUSPOINT NETWORK’S MOTION TO ENFORCEMENT SETTLEMENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Appointment of Neutral Third Party As Required Under Settlement Agreement Under Section 2 of the Settlement Agreement between D.T.V. LLC (“DTV”) and LocusPoint Networks, LLC (“LPN”), dated September 10, 2015 (the “Agreement”), DTV and LPN are to appoint a “neutral third party to ensure that WPHA enters and continues to participate in the [FCC broadcast spectrum incentive auction] until its bid is accepted by the FCC.” As of the deadline for submitting applications to participate in the broadcast incentive auction (6:00pm ET on January 12, 2016) and until the announcement of the auction results (the so-called “quiet period” under the FCC’s rules against prohibited communications), LPN and DTV will be unable to communicate with each other regarding any aspect of WPHA’s (or any station’s) bids or bid strategy. DTV therefore hereby agrees to the appointment of Pricewaterhouse Coopers Advisory Services LLC (“PwC”) to ensure WPHA’s entry and continued participation in the FCC spectrum auction by cooperating with PwC in its performance of the services outlined in Attachment A hereto. DTV further agrees to reimburse LPN at the conclusion of the “quiet period” for 50% of the fees and expenses reasonably incurred by PwC and paid by LPN in connection with WPHA up to a maximum reimbursement of $15,000 from the Auction proceeds. LPN agrees that it will not seek or accept information (from PwC or otherwise) regarding any aspect of WPHA’s bids or bid strategy during the “quiet period”. LPN further agrees that it will use its best efforts to ensure that the PwC personnel working with DTV (the “PwC Monitor(s)”) do not provide other PwC personnel, LPN, or any other person or entity information regarding any aspect of WPHA’s bids or bid strategy during the “quiet period”. 18 19 20 Agreed this ____ day of January 2016. D.T.V. LLC 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 By: __________________________________ Name: Title: Agreed this ____ day of January 2016. LocusPoint Networks, LLC By: __________________________________ Name: Title: [PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFF LOCUSPOINT NETWORK’S MOTION TO ENFORCEMENT SETTLEMENT 1 ATTACHMENT A 2 (Services to Be Rendered By PwC) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 1. Pre-Auction preparation – Prior to March 1, PwC will review and confirm the bidding strategy and procedures for WPHA’s participating in the Auction, as outlined in the parties’ agreement, with the individuals designated by DTV as its “Authorized Bidders” in its FCC Form 177 application to participate in the Auction. 2. Monitoring Services in Support of WPHA/DTV – PwC will monitor the entry of bids for WPHA in each Auction round by DTV’s Authorized Bidders in the licensee computerized bid system established by the FCC, including acceptance of all FCC “Go Off-Air” price offers, as follows:   (a) In advance of each round of the Auction, the PwC Monitor(s) and Randolph Weigner (or, in event of his unavailability for any reason, the other Authorized Bidders) will confirm with each other electronically the date and starting and closing times for that round as announced by the FCC. (b) Promptly upon the beginning of each round of the Auction, Randolph Weigner (or, in event of his unavailability for any reason, the other Authorized Bidders) will electronically transmit to the PwC Monitor(s) (1) the status of WPHA in that round of the Auction (e.g., “Active” or “Frozen”); and (2) the offer(s), if any made by the FCC for WPHA in that round of the Auction; and (3) DTV’s anticipated response(s) to those offer(s). 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (c) Promptly upon submitting DTV’s WPHA-related response(s) to the FCC’s offer(s), and in any event prior to the end of that round of the Auction, Randolph Weigner (or, in event of his unavailability for any reason, the other Authorized Bidders) will electronically transmit DTV’s actually submitted WPHA-related response(s) to the PwC Monitor(s), by providing PwC a “screen shot” or similar confirmation of the response(s). From the deadline for filing applications to participate in the Auction (January 12, 2016) until the FCC announces the Auction results (the “Quiet Period”), under no circumstances will PwC’s personnel who are in contact with DTV regarding WPHA’s Auction bids communicate any of the WPHA bids or bid strategies to LPN or be involved with any other station’s bids or bidding strategies. In addition, during the Quiet Period, PwC will take reasonable steps to assure that all PwC personnel who are designated as the primary or alternate PwC representative to a Station or Licensee will not be privy to, or communicate, the bids or bidding strategies of any other Station or Licensee. PwC will also implement internal controls during the Quiet Period to assure that information concerning the bids or bidding strategies of any [PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFF LOCUSPOINT NETWORK’S MOTION TO ENFORCEMENT SETTLEMENT 1 2 Station or Licensee to which PwC is providing Services will not be communicated by PwC to any other Covered Television Licensee or applicant in the Auction, as those terms are defined by the FCC. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON PLAINTIFF LOCUSPOINT NETWORK’S MOTION TO ENFORCEMENT SETTLEMENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?